Teams

Stordahl 40 Something

2026 Adult 40 & Over Winter · 3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-11vs Saturn It UpWon 31
W#1 DoublesJacqueline Williams / Courtney Knutson vs Tisha Colton / Karen Abel7-6, 6-2
L#1 SinglesDunja Sher vs Angel Chandler5-7, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMolly Dymit / Kathy Cima vs Jaimee Lucke Hendrikson / Verena van Fleet7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesPamela Snyder / Jill Sisk vs Denise Hindt / Rena Feldman6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2026-03-04vs LeDoux/Schneider Winter '26Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJacqueline Williams / Courtney Knutson vs Renee McCloden / Kathryn Schneider6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesDunja Sher vs Sarah Curfman1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMolly Dymit / Kathy Cima vs Lisbeth Sjoblad / Lisa Schroeder5-7, 1-6
2026-02-25vs Wolson SnowballersLost 13
W#1 DoublesShannon Overdahl / Molly Dymit vs Nancy Gunderson / Kristi Herro1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesChristina Farrell vs Kristin Kroeger1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJacqueline Williams / Courtney Knutson vs Jennifer Flanigan / Kirsten Galloway3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKathy Cima / Jill Sisk vs Karen Saklad / Cori Miller6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2026-02-11vs Landrus 40+ W26Won 21
W#1 DoublesCourtney Knutson / Jacqueline Williams vs Jennifer Warren / Emily Starita5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMolly Dymit / Jill Sisk vs Annette Ellson / Janet Hansen1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesChristina Farrell / Pamela Snyder vs Amy Rich / Barbara Shields7-5, 6-4
2026-02-04vs Ludwig WinterSplit 22
L#1 DoublesCourtney Knutson / Jacqueline Williams vs Julie Cole / Susan Streif4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#1 SinglesDunja Sher vs Courtney Kupsch4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMolly Dymit / Jill Sisk vs Vicki Bachmann / Stacy Ludwig3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesChristina Farrell / Pamela Snyder vs Tracie Medina / LISA PECK7-5, 7-6
2026-01-21vs Brady/Ehle 40+ WinterLost 03
L#1 DoublesJacqueline Williams / Courtney Knutson vs Jean Kolstad / Kathleen Gesensway4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesChristina Farrell vs Melanie Driscoll2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKathy Cima / Shannon Overdahl vs Angela Hilo / Christine Wellner4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-01-14vs Stern: RTC LadiesLost 03
L#1 DoublesCourtney Knutson / Jacqueline Williams vs Pam Bowden / Ruth Eliason0-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesDunja Sher vs Kristin Lambrecht2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKathy Cima / Pamela Snyder vs Michelle Faucher / Wendi Stern2-6, 0-6
2026-01-07vs Carling: SnowballsLost 04
L#1 DoublesMolly Dymit / Kathy Cima vs Cathleen Maloney / Lori Carling3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJacqueline Williams vs Michelle Nauertz3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJill Sisk / Courtney Knutson vs Melonie Sebring / Elizabeth Shimota3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesPamela Snyder / Christina Farrell vs Christine Horton / Ellen Spika4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Jacqueline Williams
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published
3.21
Shannon Overdahl
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.12
Jill Sisk
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.11
Courtney Knutson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.08
Molly Dymit
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.08
Dunja Sher
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.05
Kathy Cima
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.01
Christina Farrell
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5
2.93
Pamela Snyder
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.30
Kelly Stordahl
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Molly Dymit + Shannon Overdahl3649% games+6.3% vs expected
Jacqueline Williams + Courtney Knutson51443% games−1.2% vs expected
Christina Farrell + Pamela Snyder2343% games−3.0% vs expected
Shannon Overdahl + Kathy Cima3942% games−4.2% vs expected
Molly Dymit + Kathy Cima81438% games−7.2% vs expected
Jill Sisk + Jacqueline Williams044 matchesnot enough data
Molly Dymit + Jill Sisk033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jacqueline Williams
31W–48L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.37
Shannon Overdahl
15W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
Jill Sisk
22W–28L career · 5 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Courtney Knutson
5W–16L career · 8 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.11
Molly Dymit
16W–44L career · 6 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
3.08
Dunja Sher
13W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%29%71%
3.08
Kathy Cima
17W–44L career · 6 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.05
3.5
Christina Farrell
3W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
3.01
Pamela Snyder
9W–20L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93
Kelly Stordahl
10W–39L career · no lines in 2026
93%7%<1%
2.30

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.