Teams

SAN CARLOS TC/ARGUELLO PK 40AW3.5A-DT

2025 ADULT 40&Over - Daytime · Women's 3.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
L#1 DoublesCarole Donnelly / Lisa Sullivan vs Jennifer Chon / Xuan Wei4-6, 3-6
2025-02-25vs CUBBERLEY 40AW3.5B-DTLost 01
L#2 DoublesBrigit Karle / Julie Mandia vs Marsha Heimbecker / Ashley Unyoung Kim5-7, 5-7
2025-01-16vs RINCONADA PK 40AW3.5A-DTLost 01
L#1 SinglesKhin Tint vs Marta Niemczyk-Niewiadomska6-7, 4-6
2025-01-14vs CUBBERLEY 40AW3.5B-DTWon 10
W#1 DoublesLisa Sullivan / Carole Donnelly vs Viviane Bahia / Kathy Nagamine7-5, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Anna Plume
published 4
3.61
Nancy Miyasaki
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Katja Gagen
published
3.53
Michele Wang
published
3.52
Faye Chu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Ashi Labouisse
published 3.5
3.38
Sarah Ehler
published
3.37
Patricia Buck
published
3.31
Carole Donnelly
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Melissa Weiss
published
3.28
Katie Spielman
published
3.27
Sarah Chai
published
3.21
Khin Tint
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.14
Denise Dinsmore
published 3.5
3.06
Julie Mandia
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Miyasaki + Ashi Labouisse4176% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Miyasaki + Sarah Chai404 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Miyasaki + Katja Gagen303 matchesnot enough data
Carole Donnelly + Sarah Chai213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anna Plume
8W–16L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.75
Nancy Miyasaki
35W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%22%78%
3.61
Katja Gagen
36W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.58
Michele Wang
21W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.53
Faye Chu
19W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.52
3.5
Ashi Labouisse
20W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
Sarah Ehler
10W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
Patricia Buck
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
Carole Donnelly
9W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Melissa Weiss
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Katie Spielman
7W–9L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.28
Sarah Chai
14W–14L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Khin Tint
40W–42L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Denise Dinsmore
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.14
Julie Mandia
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.06

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.