Teams

SFT:Spark Fitness & Tennis; Green;Bugbee

2021 EMA Tri Level · 4.5 Women

2 players · average NTRP 4.00 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesHilary Bugbee / Sharon Kamens vs Juana Luneau / Sandra Harrington1-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesHilary Bugbee / Sharon Kamens vs Donna Shea / Laurie Byron7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2020-10-25vs WOB:Woburn;MaguireWon 10
W#1 DoublesHilary Bugbee / Sharon Kamens vs Allison Vizgaitis / Madeline King6-3, 7-5
2020-10-11vs WOB:Woburn;MaguireLost 01
L#1 DoublesHilary Bugbee / Sharon Kamens vs Dominika Langnerova / Lana Cranston5-7, 6-0, 0-1
L#1 DoublesHilary Bugbee / Sharon Kamens vs Juana Luneau / Sandra Harrington1-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesHilary Bugbee / Sharon Kamens vs Donna Shea / Meghan Cokely7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 4.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LAK:Lakeville Blue;Dannison6060034
2LFNH:LF New Hampshire;Luneau/Harrington6060245
3SFT:Spark Fitness & Tennis; Green;Bugbee3333757
4WOB:Woburn;Maguire3333865
5SFT:Spark Fitness & Tennis Blue;Shea06061274
6LAK:Lakeville Green;Drago/Maimaron06061275

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.86 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Sharon Kamens
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.82
Hilary Bugbee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sharon Kamens + Hilary Bugbee7947% games−7.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sharon Kamens
112W–83L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%76%24%
3.91
4
Hilary Bugbee
33W–43L career · type A · 6 lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.82

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.