Teams

Dotoree

2024 18&Over Men · 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-07-15vs Bergen SlamSplit 22
W#1 DoublesTeajoon Kwon / Keun Ok vs John Yoon Kim / Scott Leiman6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesHAN JU LEE vs Tommy Monaco6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJoseph Kim / Youngsok Kim vs Kevin Irani / Nat Charoensook5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSteve Koo / InJae Hwang vs Will Coston / David Moylan3-6, 3-6
2024-07-08vs Net AssetsSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMinho Kim / Sehoon Chang vs Siva Kakaraparthi / Rajesh Gill5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRommel Ruby / Kevin Uhm vs Jay Kapur / Joseph Akkarakaran6-4, 6-2
L#2 SinglesInJae Hwang vs Dave Baggenstoss6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesSteve Koo / Su Park vs Robertson Sagolsem / Suman Chigurupati6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2024-07-01vs Mid Court CrisisWon 21
W#1 DoublesInJae Hwang / Kevin Uhm vs Robert Clauss / Alexander DiGuilio6-3, 7-5
L#1 SinglesSu Park vs Fabio Penaloza0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJoseph Kim / Youngsok Kim vs DJ Alston / Justin Mckay6-3, 6-3
2024-06-24vs Bergen BashersSplit 22
L#1 DoublesYoungsok Kim / Keun Ok vs Aakash Sancheti / John Carlin3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJoseph Kim / Teajoon Kwon vs Michael Ying / Jonathan Glassman6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesInJae Hwang vs Rohan Sanghani7-5, 6-0
L#3 DoublesRommel Ruby / Steve Koo vs Deepak Daryanani / Khush Bafna6-7, 5-4, 0-1
2024-06-17vs RocktenWon 31
W#1 DoublesKeun Ok / InJae Hwang vs Rajiv Rohilla / Leonard Charles2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTeajoon Kwon / Youngsok Kim vs Amit Sareen / Sarabjit Singh6-3, 6-4
L#2 SinglesKevin Uhm vs Preet Hooda6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRommel Ruby / Steve Koo vs Sankaran Krishnan / Gowthaman Kumaraswamypillai6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2024-06-10vs Bergen: WTFWon 40
W#1 DoublesKeun Ok / Teajoon Kwon vs Danilo Correa / Edmund Corvelli6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesInJae Hwang / Su Park vs Aaron Daubert-Terrigno / CHAD YOHN4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesHAN JU LEE vs Alexandru Platonov6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMinho Kim / Sehoon Chang vs Todd Allievi / Tony Ferrante6-2, 6-3
2024-06-03vs Guts and GloryWon 40
W#1 DoublesKeun Ok / Joseph Kim vs FLORIS VREEDENBURGH / Donald Thompson6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMinho Kim / Kevin Uhm vs SeeYin Ng / Joseph Mendez6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesYoungsok Kim vs Andrew Lam6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRommel Ruby / Sehoon Chang vs Alex Mogilevskiy / Andrew Friedman6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Bergen: WTF07251027279
2Dotoree07231231277
3Rockten07201536299
4Bergen Bashers07191637310
5Bergen Slam07122348339
6Guts and Glory07102555369

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

HAN JU LEE
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
InJae Hwang
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Joseph Kim
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Keun Ok
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kevin Uhm
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Minho Kim
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Rommel Ruby
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Sehoon Chang
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Steve Koo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Su Park
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Teajoon Kwon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Youngsok Kim
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Su Park + InJae Hwang4153% games+9.5% vs expected
Rommel Ruby + Sehoon Chang134 matchesnot enough data
Joseph Kim + Kevin Uhm224 matchesnot enough data
Teajoon Kwon + Keun Ok213 matchesnot enough data
Youngsok Kim + Joseph Kim213 matchesnot enough data
Youngsok Kim + Kevin Uhm123 matchesnot enough data
InJae Hwang + Kevin Uhm213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
HAN JU LEE
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
InJae Hwang
12W–6L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Joseph Kim
11W–16L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Keun Ok
15W–6L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kevin Uhm
10W–13L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Minho Kim
12W–6L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Rommel Ruby
6W–9L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sehoon Chang
6W–5L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Steve Koo
4W–6L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Su Park
15W–14L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Teajoon Kwon
51W–21L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Youngsok Kim
11W–8L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.