Teams

LA - Slice Slice Baby

2025 SoCal Doubles - LA · LA - Women 2.5

15 players · average NTRP 2.75 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-10-26vs LA - Mulholland 2.5WLost 12
L#1 DoublesMelissa Karz / Lauren Scher vs Kristin London / Lauren Morphew4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAlison Cole-kelly / Raquelle de la Rocha vs LeAnn Aharonian / Cassandra Jean Amell6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesHilary Angelo / Jocelyn Hayes vs Hillary Lowe / Frangelica Goulding6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesRaquelle de la Rocha / Gloria Hann vs Laurene Sandoval / Le Trieu1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAlison Cole-kelly / Liz Rosman vs Homa Alamdari / Brenda Pokorny3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMelissa Karz / Lauren Scher vs Angelique Cabral / Cristina Siruno6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.38 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.67
Jenna Gambaro
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Nicki Jaeger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.60
Emily Roxworthy
published
2.52
Alexandra Sann
published 3
2.46
Melissa Karz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.44
Liz Rosman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.43
Alison Cole-kelly
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.38
Eunice Lakis
published
2.33
Joelle Boucai
published
2.29
Hilary Angelo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.26
Raquelle de la Rocha
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.11
Corinna Cherian
published 2.5
2.09
Gloria Hann
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.01
Cathleen Stern
published 2.5
Jocelyn Hayes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jenna Gambaro + Alexandra Sann123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jenna Gambaro
8W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
Nicki Jaeger
12W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
13%86%1%
2.66
Emily Roxworthy
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%23%77%
2.60
3
Alexandra Sann
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
2.52
Melissa Karz
6W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
2.46
Liz Rosman
19W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%67%33%
2.44
3
Alison Cole-kelly
7W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
2.43
Eunice Lakis
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
0%80%20%
2.38
Joelle Boucai
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
0%88%12%
2.33
Hilary Angelo
2W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
93%7%<1%
2.29
Raquelle de la Rocha
16W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.26
2.5
Corinna Cherian
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Gloria Hann
6W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.09
2.5
Cathleen Stern
2W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.01
Jocelyn Hayes
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.