Teams

Tran - RS Clay

2025 Escambia Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 Mixed 40 & Over

11 players · average NTRP 3.67 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-02-27vs Farkas - RS ClayWon 10
W#2 DoublesJaymes Tran / Arlene Doyle vs Todd Fisher / Tanya Hughes6-2, 6-1
2025-02-19vs Wallace - RS ClaySplit 11
W#1 DoublesClay Anderson / Arlene Doyle vs John Wimberly / Mecy Wimberly6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesVictor Agadzi / Marina Agadzi vs Jacqueline Wallace / George Rials3-6, 2-6
2025-02-12vs Covington - PCCWon 10
W#2 DoublesClay Anderson / Arlene Doyle vs KL LeCOQ / Marie Steen6-2, 6-4
2025-02-05vs Punch - RS ClayWon 10
W#2 DoublesVictor Agadzi / Kristyn Miller vs David Cederquist / Mary Bryan6-3, 7-6
2025-01-29vs O'Neill - PCCLost 02
L#1 DoublesClay Anderson / Kristyn Miller vs Cherie Tan / Doug Gonterman6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesVictor Agadzi / Marina Agadzi vs April Schweigert / Michael Yager4-6, 2-6
2025-01-15vs Bonsignore - RS ClayWon 20
W#1 DoublesClay Anderson / Arlene Doyle vs Luis Camero / Stephanie Taunton6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesVictor Agadzi / Marina Agadzi vs Russ Parris / Jennifer Johnson3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-01-08vs Haigler - RS ClayLost 01
L#1 DoublesJaymes Tran / Marina Agadzi vs Robin Olsson / Carolyn Bosworth6-3, 6-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Arlene Doyle
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.56
Marina Agadzi
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.52
Kristyn Miller
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.35
Denise Wilson
published 3.5
3.27
Wade Wilson
published
3.22
Clay Anderson
published 3.5
2.98
Victor Agadzi
published
2.92
Jeanna Dulyanai
published
2.92
Liz Payne
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.60
Jaymes Tran
published
Tyson Dunkelberger
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wade Wilson + Denise Wilson6258% games+4.3% vs expected
Kristyn Miller + Clay Anderson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Arlene Doyle
116W–44L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
4.06
Marina Agadzi
42W–59L career · 4 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.56
Kristyn Miller
134W–112L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.52
3.5
Denise Wilson
12W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.35
Wade Wilson
24W–24L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Clay Anderson
36W–19L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.22
Victor Agadzi
7W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
2.98
Jeanna Dulyanai
8W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
Liz Payne
139W–105L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.92
Jaymes Tran
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
21%78%<1%
2.60
Tyson Dunkelberger
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.