Teams

Lott

2025 Lubbock Adult Mixed League 18 & Over · 7.0 Adult Mixed

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-07-27vs JonesWon 21
W#1 DoublesZeke Lott / Kimberly Lott vs Kim Shewmake / Matt Byars5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesParker Carson / Ashlyn Landrum vs Emma Veld / Levi Siebenlist2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAshlen Sturdivant / Tyler Sturdivant vs Sarah Wakefield / Timothy Byars6-4, 6-2
2025-07-15vs JonesWon 21
W#1 DoublesEllie Carson / Johnny Fowler vs Emma Veld / Trevas Cruz6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCade Landrum / Ashlyn Landrum vs Chase Gentry / Maile Gentry7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesChad Landrum / Ashlen Sturdivant vs Clair Jones / Thomas Randers Jr3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Adult Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Gracelyn Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.76
Kimberly Lott
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.66
Johnny Fowler
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.45
Ellie Carson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Ashlyn Landrum
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Parker Carson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.32
Cade Landrum
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Jake Waldo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.27
Chad Landrum
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.97
Ashlen Sturdivant
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.79
Ryan Wulfjen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Tyler Sturdivant
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Zeke Lott
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimberly Lott + Ryan Wulfjen134 matchesnot enough data
Cade Landrum + Ashlyn Landrum224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Gracelyn Anderson
29W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.90
Kimberly Lott
41W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.76
Johnny Fowler
12W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
3.66
3.5
Ellie Carson
19W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.45
3.5
Ashlyn Landrum
19W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.33
Parker Carson
14W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Cade Landrum
9W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Jake Waldo
13W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Chad Landrum
16W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3
Ashlen Sturdivant
13W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
Ryan Wulfjen
9W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
2.79
Tyler Sturdivant
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Zeke Lott
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.