Teams

Coleman/Memphis

2026 Adult 18 & Over -Memphis · 3.0 Men 18 & over

12 players · average NTRP 2.83 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-05-07vs Moore/MemphisWon 41
W#1 DoublesJack Wellford / Patrick Nabholz vs Cepada Ransfer / Ricky Lipford6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesDaniel Schlais vs Zachary Elliott6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesHenry Hasbrouck / Jeff Bengert vs Darrius Samples / Alfonzo Lee6-2, 6-2
L#2 SinglesStephen Fly vs Ayden Jackson6-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesPaul Shifflet / William Smith vs Devarius Minor / Markeno Lester6-3, 6-4
2026-05-05vs Raymond/MemphisWon 31
W#1 DoublesZane Coleman / Brian Eason vs Paul Fultz / james wells7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJack Wellford / Daniel Schlais vs Kyle Gan / Kyle Wood6-2, 6-2
L#2 SinglesPatrick Nabholz vs Eric Barnes1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesPaul Shifflet / Nathan Evans vs Brandon Jackson / Phillip Kirlin7-5, 7-5
2026-04-26vs Hankins/MemphisWon 32
W#1 DoublesZane Coleman / Walter Hoehn vs Sean Henneberger / Bryce Daves4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMichael Rude vs DENIS BRUNOTTE6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMichael Parks / Daniel Schlais vs Barry Maynard / Jason Buchanan2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesBrian Eason vs Patrick Turner1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJack Wellford / Patrick Nabholz vs David Hopkins / Matthew Grear2-6, 6-0, 1-0
2026-03-22vs Collins/MemphisSplit 22
W#1 DoublesBrian Eason / Michael Rude vs Clark Story / Jacob Monteverde6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesZane Coleman vs Ben Collins1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesPatrick Nabholz / Jack Wellford vs Daniel Wynn / Allen Bobango6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBen Gilluly / Stephen Fly vs Colt Von Lanken / James Olsen5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men 18 & over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.14
Michael Rude
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.85
Walter Hoehn
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.84
Jack Wellford
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.81
Zane Coleman
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.78
Brian Eason
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.74
Daniel Schlais
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.64
Henry Hasbrouck
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Patrick Nabholz
usually #1 Doubles 25%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.59
Paul Shifflet
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
2.57
Ben Gilluly
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.36
Stephen Fly
usually #2 Doubles 29%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
2.34
Nathan Evans
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 43% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paul Shifflet + Nathan Evans4257% gamesnot enough data
Jack Wellford + Patrick Nabholz303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Rude
20W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%16%84%
3.14
Walter Hoehn
12W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%86%14%
2.85
Jack Wellford
9W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
2.84
Zane Coleman
16W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
2.81
3
Brian Eason
22W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Daniel Schlais
6W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
Henry Hasbrouck
5W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
15%84%1%
2.64
Patrick Nabholz
5W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
2.63
Paul Shifflet
11W–9L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%26%74%
2.59
2.5
Ben Gilluly
6W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%31%69%
2.57
Stephen Fly
6W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%83%17%
2.36
Nathan Evans
9W–12L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%88%12%
2.34

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.