Teams

BBTL55/Kehres/Hampton Hall

Mixed 55 & Over · 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-07-01vs BBTL55/Gilchrist/Sun CityWon 20
W#1 DoublesStephen Meyer / Deborah McGee vs Ronald Geib / Linda Matthai6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRich Raspet / Jeanette Shultz vs Chris Malstrom / Leda Shovelton6-3, 6-4
2025-06-24vs BBTL55/Harwood/Sun CityLost 03
L#1 DoublesDavid Kehres / Theresa Terschan vs Troy Havens / Judi Sharkey1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesGeorge Knoske / Barbara Thompson vs John Harden / Pam Harms3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJames Kurdek / Jeanette Shultz vs Chuck Hasenauer / Laurie Williams3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-05-27vs BBTL55/Gilchrist/Sun CitySplit 11
W#1 DoublesAlice Dalatri / David Kehres vs Lucinda Good / David S. Hale7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLisa Odell / George Knoske vs Randi Selman / Dave Bogan6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2025-05-20vs BBTL55/Harwood/Sun CityLost 12
L#1 DoublesDavid Kehres / Deborah McGee vs Dan Costanza / Jody Winer2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesGeorge Knoske / Lisa Odell vs Judi Sharkey / Donald McCarl6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBarbara Thompson / James Kurdek vs Susan Peters / Steven Nygren6-2, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
David Kehres
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.58
Christian Cole
published 3.5
3.44
Barbara Thompson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.43
Eve Fowler
published
3.40
George Knoske
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Theresa Terschan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Deborah McGee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Jeanette Shultz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Pam Pok
published
3.06
Lisa Odell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
James Kurdek
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Rich Raspet
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
David Kehres
29W–13L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%20%80%
3.62
3.5
Christian Cole
38W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%29%71%
3.58
3.5
Barbara Thompson
61W–39L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.44
Eve Fowler
41W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.43
George Knoske
23W–14L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.40
Theresa Terschan
35W–19L career · 1 line in 2024
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Deborah McGee
55W–30L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.30
Jeanette Shultz
29W–29L career · 2 lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
3.13
Pam Pok
23W–19L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.13
Lisa Odell
14W–26L career · 2 lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
3.06
James Kurdek
9W–10L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Rich Raspet
7W–10L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.