Teams

Patrizio/Nashville

2026 Adult 55 & Over - Nashville · 3.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-27vs Todesco/NashvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesLea Ann Sexton / Carol Stansbury vs Kelly Cole / Marian Vangeli0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesNicole Keenan / Stacey Wade vs Cammy Arney / Susan Manley7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesPatricia Franks / Beth Patrizio vs Melissa Briner / Lesly Todesco3-6, 2-6
2026-04-20vs McRae/NashvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesNicole Keenan / Laura Saul vs Kim McRae / Lisa Beasley6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesStacey Wade / Tawnee Bennett vs Joelle Speed / Allison Braswell3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJoni Jestings / Lea Ann Sexton vs Kim Bright / Kim West6-4, 6-3
2026-04-13vs Simoneaux/Byrd/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesNicole Keenan / Tawnee Bennett vs Cheryl Byrd / Barb Morris5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Saul / Wendy Farley vs Lisa Hamlin / Jennifer McNabb4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesStacey Wade / Beth Patrizio vs Lori Pearce / Dawn Flora3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-04-06vs Todesco/NashvilleWon 21
L#1 DoublesLaura Saul / Lea Ann Sexton vs Kelly Bennie / Marian Vangeli0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesBeth Patrizio / Carol Stansbury vs Kerri Frye / Melissa Briner3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJoni Jestings / Wendy Farley vs Amy Hirt / Cammy Arney6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2026-03-30vs Palk/NashvilleWon 30
W#1 DoublesBeth Patrizio / Mary Glennon vs Bettina Moore / Whitney Thompson6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTawnee Bennett / Nicole Keenan vs Brandi White / Sue Anne Perry6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesStacey Wade / Laura Saul vs Lee Anne Hagan / Catherine Williamson6-2, 6-0
2026-03-23vs Pulley/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesNicole Keenan / Mary Glennon vs Rebecca Sara Cook / Susan Furman7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJoni Jestings / Lea Ann Sexton vs Mary Fetherling / Jennifer Roh1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBeth Gottlieb / Stacey Wade vs Veronica Pulley / Angie Howard6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2026-03-16vs McRae/NashvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesNicole Keenan / Mary Glennon vs Kim McRae / Kim Bright6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKim Poole / Carol Stansbury vs Adelaide Geer / Lisa Beasley7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJoni Jestings / Wendy Farley vs Laurie Farris / Lee Oakley5-7, 7-5, 0-1
2026-03-09vs Simoneaux/Byrd/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesBeth Gottlieb / Lea Ann Sexton vs Marsha Simoneaux / Barb Morris2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesPatricia Franks / Beth Patrizio vs Gina Drummonds / Janet Barber2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLisa Hulett / Stacey Wade vs Nita Hollis / Jennifer McNabb6-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Nicole Keenan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.31
Laura Saul
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.24
Beth Gottlieb
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.22
Beth Patrizio
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.08
Carol Stansbury
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.04
Wendy Farley
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.02
Mary Glennon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Stacey Wade
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.95
Lea Ann Sexton
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.90
Patricia Franks
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.79
Joni Jestings
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.73
Tawnee Bennett
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Kim Poole
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lisa Hulett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacey Wade + Nicole Keenan5058% games+8.8% vs expected
Beth Patrizio + Patricia Franks134 matchesnot enough data
Tawnee Bennett + Nicole Keenan134 matchesnot enough data
Beth Patrizio + Wendy Farley213 matchesnot enough data
Mary Glennon + Lea Ann Sexton123 matchesnot enough data
Tawnee Bennett + Stacey Wade033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nicole Keenan
19W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%78%21%
3.39
Laura Saul
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Beth Gottlieb
16W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Beth Patrizio
10W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Carol Stansbury
3W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
27%72%<1%
3.08
Wendy Farley
14W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
3.04
Mary Glennon
11W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
3.02
Stacey Wade
11W–21L career · 6 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
2.98
Lea Ann Sexton
5W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
65%35%<1%
2.95
Patricia Franks
8W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
2.90
Joni Jestings
9W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
94%6%<1%
2.79
Tawnee Bennett
2W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
97%3%<1%
2.73
Kim Poole
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Lisa Hulett
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.