Teams

Crawley

2021 Anne Arundel Adult 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over Men 4.0

9 players · average NTRP 4.10 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-05-25vs GladdenWon 21
L#1 DoublesMark Guo / Alexander Gerson vs Steve Newcomer / Jack Lavinder5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 SinglesDat Doan vs Key Sar6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDONALD CRAWLEY / Michael Jarman vs Gary Gladden / Richard Albers6-1, 6-4
2021-05-22vs AppelLost 01
L#1 SinglesDat Doan vs Justin Wagner4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-05-20vs TurnleyWon 20
W#2 SinglesDat Doan vs Bobby Martin6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDONALD CRAWLEY / Joseph Marino vs Kushal Patel / Larry Johnson6-7, 6-0, 1-0
2021-05-15vs ThomassonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDONALD CRAWLEY / Daniel Berland vs Luis Lozano / Jason Campion7-5, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAlexander Gerson / Mark Guo vs Thomas Chappell / Andre Taggart6-4, 6-4
2021-05-10Won 20
W#1 SinglesDat Doan vs Hector Cortes6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesFatih Selekler / Mark Guo vs Christopher Bell / Keith Patrick7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2021-04-29vs NicholsonWon 10
W#3 DoublesDONALD CRAWLEY / Zachary Patterson vs Joshua Sadler / Ross Foca6-2, 6-4
2021-04-19vs GladdenWon 20
W#1 DoublesFatih Selekler / Mark Guo vs Greg Leihy / Richard Albers4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDONALD CRAWLEY / Zachary Patterson vs Volkan Taskin / Key Sar6-1, 6-2
2021-04-06vs ThomassonWon 10
W#2 DoublesDONALD CRAWLEY / Mark Guo vs Jason Campion / Adam Thomasson6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.07
Douglas Hamilton
published 4.5
3.92
Alexander Gerson
published 4
3.85
DONALD CRAWLEY
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.81
Dat Doan
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4
3.62
Nhat Ngo
published
3.52
Mark Guo
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.13
Michael Holder
published
Justin Groenewold
published
Richard Lucas
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Douglas Hamilton
2W–5L career · no lines in 2021
31%69%<1%
4.07
4
Alexander Gerson
28W–21L career · no lines in 2021
<1%73%27%
3.92
4
DONALD CRAWLEY
473W–252L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%87%12%
3.85
4
Dat Doan
136W–155L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.81
Nhat Ngo
1W–12L career · no lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
3.62
4
Mark Guo
68W–128L career · 5 lines in 2021
45%55%<1%
3.52
Michael Holder
7W–6L career · no lines in 2021
16%83%<1%
3.13
Justin Groenewold
5W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Richard Lucas
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.