Teams

New Orleans - Roddy

18 & Over Adult Local at State - Women · 5.0 (18&O) Women

6 players · average NTRP / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-06-08vs Multi Area - Fioretti/BergesonLost 12
L#1 DoublesNancy Marcello / Elizabeth Brinson vs Giovanna Fioretti / Cassie Bergeson1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesTiffany Mann vs Nadia Hitzman0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMeredith Montgomery / Kim Roddy vs Indi Mire Faught / Niamh Packer6-4, 7-5
2025-06-08vs Multi Area - Fioretti/BergesonLost 03
L#1 DoublesMeredith Montgomery / Kim Roddy vs Victoria Fisher / Therina Steenkamp3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesNancy Marcello vs Nadia Hitzman0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNicole Charbonnet / Sarah Evans vs Niamh Packer / Indi Mire Faught1-6, 1-6
2025-06-07vs Multi Area - Fioretti/BergesonLost 12
L#1 DoublesNicole Charbonnet / Sarah Evans vs Cassie Bergeson / Therina Steenkamp1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Brinson vs Giovanna Fioretti1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesTiffany Mann / Nancy Marcello vs Victoria Fisher / Nadia Hitzman6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2025-06-07vs Multi Area - Fioretti/BergesonLost 03
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Brinson / Tiffany Mann vs Giovanna Fioretti / Therina Steenkamp1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesNancy Marcello vs Cassie Bergeson6-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMeredith Montgomery / Kim Roddy vs Indi Mire Faught / Niamh Packer5-7, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.0 (18&O) Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Elizabeth Brinson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Kim Roddy
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Meredith Montgomery
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Nancy Marcello
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Nicole Charbonnet
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Tiffany Mann
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meredith Montgomery + Kim Roddy123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elizabeth Brinson
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kim Roddy
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Meredith Montgomery
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nancy Marcello
2W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nicole Charbonnet
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tiffany Mann
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.