Teams

LLTC - Racquet Knights

*2024 Houston Fall League (2023) NA - Thursday Men's Doubles · Men 4.5

20 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Men 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Phi Huynh
published
4.00
James Gao
published
3.85
Israel Corona
published
3.82
Lening Wang
published
3.81
3.79
David Herrin
published 4
3.73
Mark Etienne
published
3.72
Giovanny Iabichino
published
3.72
Antonio Garcia
published 4
3.71
Jordan Payne
published
3.69
Dillon Piper
published 4
3.67
Ramana Surya
published
3.52
Kit Joseph Shum
published
3.41
Stern Yeh
published
Chi Yu
published
David Sotelo
published
Jeson Li
published
Justin Chang
published
Pablo Codesal
published
Tri Pham
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jordan Payne + Mark Etienne4255% games+5.8% vs expected
Kit Joseph Shum + Ramana Surya3545% games+2.5% vs expected
Kit Joseph Shum + Antonio Garcia6352% games+2.4% vs expected
David Sotelo + Israel Corona6164% gamesnot enough data
Kit Joseph Shum + Pablo Codesal4249% gamesnot enough data
Kit Joseph Shum + Eric Metcalf-Doetsch5159% gamesnot enough data
Jordan Payne + Giovanny Iabichino1442% gamesnot enough data
Israel Corona + Antonio Garcia314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Phi Huynh
27W–39L career · no lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
4.03
James Gao
7W–3L career · no lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
4.00
Israel Corona
27W–19L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.85
Lening Wang
80W–38L career · no lines in 2024
0%<1%>99%
3.82
Eric Metcalf-Doetsch
52W–23L career · no lines in 2024
<1%1%99%
3.81
4
David Herrin
8W–15L career · type S · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.79
Mark Etienne
48W–31L career · no lines in 2024
<1%5%95%
3.73
Giovanny Iabichino
22W–14L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Antonio Garcia
46W–13L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
Jordan Payne
16W–9L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Dillon Piper
13W–21L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
Ramana Surya
37W–34L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.67
Kit Joseph Shum
37W–34L career · no lines in 2024
<1%44%56%
3.52
Stern Yeh
40W–25L career · no lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.41
Chi Yu
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
David Sotelo
17W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jeson Li
6W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Justin Chang
19W–15L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Pablo Codesal
44W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tri Pham
23W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.