Teams

GJTC JWENDT

2022 CTA TWILIGHT - WS · MEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT - WS

12 players · average NTRP 3.44 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-09-06vs GJTC RSHARPLost 12
L#1 DoublesSteve Brown / Jeff Thornton vs Skyler Cutsforth / David Pacini2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesDonald Ligrani vs Richard Plett6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesBradley Seago / Greg Anoia vs John Rhoads / Christopher Cutsforth6-7, 0-6
2022-08-31vs GJTC RSHARPLost 12
L#1 DoublesJohn Stewart / Blake Bickham vs Christopher Cutsforth / Whit Blair6-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesDonald Ligrani vs Richard Plett6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesJoseph Pologar / Wayne Smith vs David Pacini / Craig Smith6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2022-08-30vs GJTC JHANNALost 03
L#1 DoublesBlake Bickham / Jeff Thornton vs David Fife / Dan Johnson2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesGreg Anoia vs Stuart Hall0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Wendt / Wayne Smith vs Andy Ford / Rex Zerr7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2022-08-25vs GJTC KKILLIANSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRyan Scotting / Tarrell Rodrigues vs Matt Delao / Dan Terrell6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesBradley Seago / Alan MacH vs Curt Hansen / Kevin McGuinness7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2022-08-23vs GJTC KKILLIANWon 21
W#1 DoublesJohn Stewart / Donald Ligrani vs Dan Terrell / Dan Oliver6-0, 7-5
L#1 SinglesTarrell Rodrigues vs James Dannibale4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesBlake Bickham / Steve Brown vs Keith Killian / Kevin McGuinness6-1, 7-6
2022-08-16vs GJTC RSHARPWon 21
W#1 DoublesAlan MacH / John Stewart vs Christopher Cutsforth / Skyler Cutsforth6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesGreg Anoia vs John Rhoads6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesJoseph Pologar / Keith Decker vs Craig Smith / David Pacini4-6, 4-6
2022-08-09vs GJTC JHANNAWon 30
W#1 DoublesDonald Ligrani / John Stewart vs Stuart Hall / Dan Johnson6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesTarrell Rodrigues vs John Hanna6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSteve Brown / Ryan Scotting vs John Kohls / Rex Zerr6-4, 6-2
2022-08-02vs GJTC KKILLIANLost 12
L#1 DoublesJeff Thornton / Ryan Scotting vs Matt Delao / Dan Oliver4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#1 SinglesTarrell Rodrigues vs James Dannibale4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesBradley Seago / Wayne Smith vs Keith Killian / Kevin McGuinness6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · MEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT - WS
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GJTC KKILLIAN63151227232
2GJTC RSHARP54141330253
3GJTC JWENDT36111633254
4GJTC JHANNA36111634266

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Donald Ligrani
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.46
Greg Anoia
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.36
Keith Decker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Alan MacH
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.34
Ryan Scotting
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Blake Bickham
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Tarrell Rodrigues
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.26
Jeff Thornton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Bradley Seago
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.98
Wayne Smith
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
John Wendt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Joseph Pologar
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tarrell Rodrigues + Blake Bickham5260% games+11.7% vs expected
Blake Bickham + Donald Ligrani7066% games+10.0% vs expected
Alan MacH + Greg Anoia7063% games+8.4% vs expected
Wayne Smith + Blake Bickham4356% games+8.3% vs expected
Jeff Thornton + Ryan Scotting5462% games+8.2% vs expected
Keith Decker + Donald Ligrani24370% games+8.1% vs expected
Greg Anoia + John Wendt3453% games+0.4% vs expected
Alan MacH + John Wendt4161% games−0.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Donald Ligrani
122W–36L career · type A · 4 lines in 2022
<1%9%91%
3.67
3.5
Greg Anoia
45W–44L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%62%38%
3.46
Keith Decker
53W–20L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Alan MacH
38W–20L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Ryan Scotting
71W–29L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
3.34
3.5
Blake Bickham
77W–46L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Tarrell Rodrigues
62W–41L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
Jeff Thornton
65W–53L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Bradley Seago
6W–11L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Wayne Smith
27W–52L career · 3 lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
2.98
John Wendt
23W–24L career · 1 line in 2022
84%16%<1%
2.87
3
Joseph Pologar
38W–34L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%91%9%
2.82

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.