Teams

ROUND HILL CC 18AW3.5A

2025 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 3.5

19 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
W#2 DoublesJennifer Davis / Nanny Tunnell vs Nancy Blom / Cynthia Attiyeh6-2, 7-5
L#1 DoublesShawn Young / Mihaela Farnholtz vs Jill Freeman / Adrianna Lugo3-6, 3-6
2025-05-31vs MORAGA CC 18AW3.5ALost 01
L#3 DoublesJennifer Davis / Nanny Tunnell vs Jill Hudson / Jennifer Yolasan4-6, 6-7
2025-04-08vs ORINDA CC 18AW3.5AWon 10
W#2 DoublesJennifer Davis / Nanny Tunnell vs Lynn Molloy / Jennie McCashin6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Wendy Gulden
published
3.63
Viviana Meyer
published
3.41
Sunita Mistry
published
3.36
Michelle Bauer
published
3.33
Shawn Young
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Allene Rognon
published 3.5
3.30
Cecily Barclay
published 3.5
3.27
Kathryn Rupp
published
3.24
Jennifer Davis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Nanny Tunnell
published
3.19
Sarah Shapiro
published
3.14
Yolla Elahmadie
published
3.14
Trish Nornhold
published
3.13
Tami Finegold
published
3.12
Tori DeCoite
published
3.00
Katie Hamlin
published
Rachel Gilchrist
published
Robin Azevedo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sunita Mistry + Viviana Meyer5255% games+6.3% vs expected
Shawn Young + Trish Nornhold224 matchesnot enough data
Rachel Gilchrist + Trish Nornhold044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Wendy Gulden
16W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.70
Viviana Meyer
14W–13L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.63
Sunita Mistry
18W–14L career · no lines in 2025
74%26%<1%
3.41
Michelle Bauer
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.36
Shawn Young
21W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Allene Rognon
12W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Cecily Barclay
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
Kathryn Rupp
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Jennifer Davis
49W–61L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%92%3%
3.24
Nanny Tunnell
5W–15L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Sarah Shapiro
11W–10L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
Yolla Elahmadie
5W–18L career · no lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.14
Trish Nornhold
5W–14L career · no lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.14
Tami Finegold
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.13
Tori DeCoite
11W–7L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
Katie Hamlin
11W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.00
Hilary Andersen Hurlbut
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rachel Gilchrist
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Robin Azevedo
7W–15L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.