Teams

Cober 3.5W 65s Th AM

2024 Piedmont USTA 65 & Over · 3.5 Women 65 & Over

9 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Women 65 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Denise Fiery
published 3.5
2.82
Deborah Elston
published 3.5
Bette Boone
published 3
Dena Gibson
published 3
Fairy Coleman
published 3
Glenda Burkett
published 3
Karen Brady-Siler
published
Scottie Penn
published
Susan Abels
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Denise Fiery
5W–9L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.07
3.5
Deborah Elston
1W–6L career · type A · no lines in 2024
91%9%<1%
2.82
3
Bette Boone
5W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Dena Gibson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Fairy Coleman
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Glenda Burkett
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Karen Brady-Siler
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Scottie Penn
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Susan Abels
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.