Teams

UPTA55/Spitzmiller/Thornblade

2023 UPTA Adult 55 & Over - USTA · 55+ Adult Women - 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.20 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-04-12vs UPTA55/Buch/CardinalLost 01
L#2 DoublesKaren Gallagher / Pamela Finigan vs Maureen Bisset / Catherine Murry3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-03-29vs UPTA55/Kelley/Keowee KeyLost 01
L#2 DoublesKaren Gallagher / Angela Joffe vs Jan Kelley / Sharon Thomas4-6, 3-6
2023-03-08vs UPTA55/Dresden/KrocWon 10
W#3 DoublesKaren Gallagher / Angela Joffe vs Tracy Churdar / Elizabeth McDonough6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55+ Adult Women - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.24
Marie Crumpler
published
3.21
Sally Seaver
published
3.12
Lisa Seay
published
3.11
Angela Joffe
published 3.5
3.09
Pamela Finigan
published
3.06
Cathy Spitzmiller
published 3.5
2.96
Julia Mullen
published
2.84
Carrie Dickert
published 3
2.84
Shelley Mckay
published
2.81
Patty B Counihan
published
Karen Gallagher
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.51
Amy Cupples
published 3
Nancy Robinson
published
Rhonda Fischer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Cupples + Cathy Spitzmiller4155% games+10.2% vs expected
Pamela Finigan + Angela Joffe3643% games+8.9% vs expected
Pamela Finigan + Lisa Seay4249% games−1.0% vs expected
Angela Joffe + Marie Crumpler2356% games−4.8% vs expected
Pamela Finigan + Cathy Spitzmiller3249% gamesnot enough data
Sally Seaver + Cathy Spitzmiller213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marie Crumpler
9W–10L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.24
Sally Seaver
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
Lisa Seay
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.12
3.5
Angela Joffe
28W–34L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.11
Pamela Finigan
18W–26L career · no lines in 2023
25%74%<1%
3.09
3.5
Cathy Spitzmiller
15W–11L career · no lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.06
Julia Mullen
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
2.96
3
Carrie Dickert
9W–20L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%13%
2.84
Shelley Mckay
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%13%
2.84
Patty B Counihan
5W–11L career · no lines in 2023
91%9%<1%
2.81
3
Karen Gallagher
39W–108L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Amy Cupples
16W–26L career · no lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
2.51
Nancy Robinson
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rhonda Fischer
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.