Teams

Martin

2022 Anne Arundel Adult 18 & Over · Anne Arundel Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.82 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule15 played
2022-07-01vs BernsteinWon 20
W#1 SinglesSherry Orebaugh vs Deborah Greenside6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesTeresa Pedley vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-06-26vs The Vicious AcesLost 03
L#1 DoublesTeresa Pedley / Dina Caddeo vs Tia Sanchez / Janette O Logan1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesSherry Orebaugh vs Skeeta Narciss3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesAshten Rea vs Claris Brock3-6, 3-6
2022-06-25vs Bontempo/McClatchyWon 20
W#1 SinglesAshten Rea vs Lisa Marthens6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesSherry Orebaugh vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-06-21vs Party at the NetSplit 22
L#1 DoublesHelen Patterson / Dina Caddeo vs Kristen Eckenrode / Marie Thorne5-7, 6-7
L#1 SinglesAshten Rea vs Kathy Crowley6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesTeresa Pedley vs Lauren Procaccini6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMesanie Lee / Sherry Orebaugh vs Valeri Albert / Meghan Reinhart6-3, 6-4
2022-06-18vs BernsteinWon 20
W#1 SinglesTeresa Pedley vs Deborah Greenside6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesAshten Rea vs Beth Fuhrer6-4, 6-4
2022-06-11Won 10
W#1 SinglesSherry Orebaugh vs Julie Langlie6-4, 5-4
2022-06-05vs AceAceBabySplit 11
W#1 DoublesHelen Patterson / Brooke Schetgen vs Audrey Gunther / Cameron Caskin7-5, 6-2
L#2 SinglesSherry Orebaugh vs Kellee Kramer4-6, 5-7
2022-06-04vs Chili PeppersLost 01
L#1 DoublesBrooke Schetgen / Stephanie Riley vs Joanne Connelly / Jennifer Noronha6-2, 5-7, 0-1
2022-06-02vs Netchix Over 18Lost 01
L#1 SinglesBrooke Schetgen vs Marissa Romanek2-6, 1-6
2022-05-30vs The Vicious AcesLost 02
L#1 DoublesDina Caddeo / Helen Patterson vs Jessica Bynum / Dannielle Freeman2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesTeresa Pedley vs Wendy Guo2-6, 4-6
2022-05-21vs Chili PeppersWon 20
W#2 SinglesSherry Orebaugh vs Krista Swetz6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSharon Richardson / Dina Caddeo vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-05-15vs Over Served 2022Won 20
W#1 SinglesTeresa Pedley vs Julie Langlie6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDina Caddeo / Helen Patterson vs Cathy Bulkley / Veronica Townsend6-3, 6-2
2022-05-14vs Netchix Over 18Lost 03
L#1 DoublesHelen Patterson / Dina Caddeo vs Diana Heinze / Kristen Staley3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesTeresa Pedley vs Heather Sutton4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSherry Orebaugh / Andrea Terry vs Dorothy Cole / Sara Vance3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-05-03vs Bontempo/McClatchySplit 11
W#1 DoublesHelen Patterson / Dina Caddeo vs Nicole Foster / Tara Ritter6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSherry Orebaugh vs Lisa Marthens4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-04-02vs AceAceBabyWon 10
W#1 DoublesDina Caddeo / Sharon Richardson vs Audrey Gunther / Shelley Williams1-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Diane Wisbeck
published 4
3.76
Teresa Pedley
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 4
3.70
3.70
Helen Patterson
published 4
3.65
Sally Christie
published
3.64
Brooke Schetgen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.62
Ashten Rea
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.49
Sherry Orebaugh
usually #1 Singles 46%, also #2 Singles 31% · published 3.5
3.46
Dina Caddeo
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 4
3.29
Ramsay Erickson
published
3.27
Mesanie Lee
published
3.25
Claire Rossmark
usually #1 Singles 39%, also #2 Singles 31% · published 3.5
3.16
Andrea Terry
published 3.5
3.08
Melissa Albers
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Leigh Deeter
published
Shelley Sturtz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dina Caddeo + Helen Patterson033 matchesnot enough data
Dina Caddeo + Sherry Orebaugh123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Diane Wisbeck
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Teresa Pedley
33W–14L career · 7 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Bethany Henderson
10W–14L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Helen Patterson
10W–14L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.70
Sally Christie
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
Brooke Schetgen
70W–75L career · 3 lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
3.64
4
Ashten Rea
143W–116L career · 4 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.62
3.5
Sherry Orebaugh
110W–54L career · 13 lines in 2022
<1%52%48%
3.49
4
Dina Caddeo
138W–171L career · 8 lines in 2022
62%38%<1%
3.46
Ramsay Erickson
16W–25L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
Mesanie Lee
26W–27L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Claire Rossmark
147W–165L career · 12 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Andrea Terry
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Melissa Albers
86W–110L career · 8 lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
Leigh Deeter
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Shelley Sturtz
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.