Teams

Vanderbilt Country Club / Witters

2025 Collier Combo 50 & Over Spring · 6.5 Combo 50 & Over Women Spring

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-13vs Isles Of Collier - M.YoungWon 10
W#2 DoublesCory Witters / Barbara Horvath vs Nina Savoca / Pamela Ginzburg6-4, 6-1
2025-05-06vs Hammock Bay - CraneLost 01
L#1 DoublesJane Doe / Cory Witters vs Kelly Lord / Paula Crane6-0, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesJane Doe / Barbara Horvath vs Nancy Spiwak / Maureen Ferguson7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDiane Micheroni / Ulla Wolff vs Margaret Caccia / Helen Wardell3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Fruendt / Jennifer Wimsatt vs Marell Kowalski / Roxy Painter7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2025-04-17vs Players Club / RieckerWon 10
W#2 DoublesJennifer Koivu / Cory Witters vs Kristine Riecker / Lisa Sackett6-3, 6-1
2025-04-15vs Bonita National / MitchellLost 01
L#1 DoublesAster Leitner / Cory Witters vs Kimberly Komlanc / Susan Lindberg7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2025-04-01vs sterling Oaks / BergstromLost 03
L#1 DoublesSharon Slozil / Jane Doe vs DEBORAH Eck / Karen Jarrold2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesHilda Champion / Jennifer Koivu vs Piper Crawford / Tobi Weinstein4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesUlla Wolff / Diane Micheroni vs Sarah Bergstrom / Debra Keenan1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Combo 50 & Over Women Spring have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
Cory Witters
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.15
Aster Leitner
published 3.5
3.11
Jennifer Koivu
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Suzanne Fruendt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Ulla Wolff
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.84
Barbara Horvath
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Hilda Champion
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jennifer Wimsatt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kathy Bagnuolo
published
Sharon Slozil
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cory Witters + Ulla Wolff3445% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cory Witters
112W–125L career · 4 lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Aster Leitner
2W–12L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.15
Jennifer Koivu
4W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.11
Suzanne Fruendt
7W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
Ulla Wolff
16W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Barbara Horvath
15W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Hilda Champion
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jennifer Wimsatt
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kathy Bagnuolo
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sharon Slozil
4W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.