Teams

VTC-Burak

2019 Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

8 players · average NTRP 3.56 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Nenette Olson
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.62
Kevin Muck
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.56
JT Smith
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
Bob Towne
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Wei Pan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.12
Lynn Hendrix
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.70
Mike Olson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published 3
2.65
Tomoko Langworthy
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
Results8 ties
2019-06-02Split 11
L#2 DoublesKevin Muck / Robin Burak vs Kevin Meier / Mary Head7-6
W#3 DoublesVincent Scopacasa / Tomoko Langworthy vs Christine Moran / Reid Larson6-4, 6-1
2019-05-19Lost 02
L#1 DoublesNenette Olson / Mike Olson vs Christine Moran / Kevin Meier6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKaren Gee / JT Smith vs Barb Lipscomb / Jeff Anhaltzer6-0, 6-4
2019-05-11Split 11
W#2 DoublesKevin Muck / Robin Burak vs Jim Wheeler / Kim Wheeler7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesBob Towne / Lynn Hendrix vs Martin Jeffrey Binns / Sheryl Wecker6-4, 7-6
2019-05-03Lost 12
W#1 DoublesLynn Hendrix / JT Smith vs Kim Wright / Zachary Wright7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCarol Adams / Bob Towne vs Elizabeth Burns / Rudy Martinez6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesClaudia Belindean / Wei Pan vs Beth Burczak / Jim DeWeese6-4, 6-2
2019-04-27Won 21
L#1 DoublesWei Pan / Karen Gee vs Marianne Conroy / Danny Denning6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKevin Muck / Robin Burak vs Julia Rea / Calvin Chen6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJT Smith / Lynn Hendrix vs Gretchen Dumestre / Douglas Brewer6-1, 6-3
2019-04-20Won 21
W#1 DoublesNenette Olson / Mike Olson vs Sandra Ellis / Colin Looi6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesVincent Scopacasa / Tomoko Langworthy vs Clay Funkhouser / Susie Garland6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKevin Muck / Robin Burak vs Brian Quiner / Wendy Vaughn6-3, 6-2
2019-04-14Won 21
W#1 DoublesCarol Adams / JT Smith vs Mike Baker / Jacqui Slominski3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTomoko Langworthy / Vincent Scopacasa vs Mike Mullen / Diane Macdonald6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNenette Olson / Mike Olson vs Chris Keefer / Sheri Schipporeit6-1, 6-4
2019-04-06Lost 12
L#1 DoublesKevin Muck / Robin Burak vs Vicki Blunt / Jon Peters7-5, 7-6
L#2 DoublesCarol Adams / Bob Towne vs Tamara Phillips / Jon Mandeville7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesClaudia Belindean / Wei Pan vs Barbara Pasmore / Jerry Bond6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Nenette Olson
122W–164L career
2%98%0%
3.71
4
Kevin Muck
64W–90L career
9%91%0%
3.62
4
JT Smith
83W–90L career
20%80%0%
3.56
3.5
Bob Towne
17W–28L career
not enough data
3.5
Wei Pan
18W–23L career · type M
2%97%1%
3.25
3.5
Lynn Hendrix
56W–47L career
11%89%0%
3.12
3
Mike Olson
68W–92L career
7%92%1%
2.70
3
Tomoko Langworthy
50W–68L career
7%93%0%
2.65

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.