Teams

RLinder/SPolacek (Life Time)

2026 Adult 55 & Over League · 55 & Over Adult 3.5 Men - Tues PM

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-05-05vs DBrantmeyer (Park Road)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesStephen Polacek / Gregory Ratledge vs Keith Summey / Ronnie Rawdon6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesThomas Hull / Cameron Jones vs ROB SAPPENFIELD / Mauricio Jurin3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRam Nanduri / Todd Paris vs Jonathan Hurd / Martie Willaby4-6, 1-6
2026-04-28vs MRousseaux (WSRC)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesThomas Hull / Cameron Jones vs Joseph Dichak / Allen Ramsey6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRam Nanduri / Gregory Ratledge vs Steve Gale / Jamie ORourke3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesStephen Polacek / Steve Rider vs Chin Lin / Peter Sofarelli6-7, 1-6
2026-04-21vs KStaley (WSRC)Won 30
W#1 DoublesCameron Jones / Ray Linder vs Eric O'Brien / Terry Lewis6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRam Nanduri / Gregory Ratledge vs Kevin Staley / Michael Twer2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesStephen Polacek / Kenji Krzywosz vs Mario Sansotta / Jim Northrup6-2, 6-1
2026-04-14vs JMorse/RTownsend (JCC)Won 30
W#1 DoublesThomas Hull / Cameron Jones vs Neill Burris / Roger Gaines6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesStephen Polacek / Ray Linder vs RONALD TOWNSEND / Peter Mayo6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesGregory Ratledge / Kirk Tatge vs Rob Owen / Erik Stokkebye2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 DoublesThomas Hull / Ray Linder vs Ed Huggins / Ian Clarke6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBiju Nair / Leonard Brecken vs Roger Gallagher / Peter Hildner6-4, 6-3
2026-03-31vs GQuattlebaum (OPRC)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesGregory Ratledge / Todd Paris vs Wally Dawson / Scott Schrimsher2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCameron Jones / Thomas Hull vs Eric Jenkins / Robert Salvucci3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRay Linder / Ram Nanduri vs Gerald Quattlebaum / Rich Kennedy6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2026-03-24vs RCummings (Carmel)Won 30
W#1 DoublesThomas Hull / Cameron Jones vs Gene Lowe / Tom Parker6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesStephen Polacek / Ray Linder vs Robert Cummings / Rick Welsh6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesGregory Ratledge / David Joo vs Charles McNealy / Daniel Miller6-1, 7-5
2026-03-17vs JBoyles (Pine Lake)Won 21
L#1 DoublesThomas Hull / Biju Nair vs Donald VanCott / Paul Konzen6-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesStephen Polacek / Ray Linder vs Marc Swann / Sam Basden6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesTodd Paris / Kirk Tatge vs David Kylander / Wayne Burgamy6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2026-03-03vs MFresina (Raintree)Won 21
W#1 DoublesThomas Hull / Cameron Jones vs Tom Stapleton / Jon Luther6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesStephen Polacek / Ray Linder vs Michael Fresina / Philip Solomon7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesBiju Nair / Ram Nanduri vs David Balas / Russell Wood6-7, 5-7
2026-02-24vs KFox/Myers (Blakeney)Won 21
W#1 DoublesThomas Hull / Cameron Jones vs Peter Hollis / David Tyson6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesStephen Polacek / Ray Linder vs Michael Jeffs / Joseph Stavola6-0, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLeonard Brecken / Steve Rider vs Rodney Myers / Jorge Bravo6-3, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult 3.5 Men - Tues PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Thomas Hull
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
3.49
Stephen Polacek
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.42
Ray Linder
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.32
Ram Nanduri
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Cameron Jones
published 3.5
3.23
David Joo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Gregory Ratledge
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.18
Leonard Brecken
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.16
Todd Paris
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.14
Kirk Tatge
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kenji Krzywosz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ray Linder + Stephen Polacek15759% games+8.1% vs expected
Cameron Jones + Stephen Polacek303 matchesnot enough data
Todd Paris + Kirk Tatge123 matchesnot enough data
Todd Paris + Stephen Polacek213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Thomas Hull
18W–8L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%24%76%
3.60
3.5
Stephen Polacek
99W–83L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
3.49
3.5
Ray Linder
53W–28L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.42
Ram Nanduri
5W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%89%9%
3.32
3.5
Cameron Jones
19W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
David Joo
3W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
5%92%2%
3.23
Gregory Ratledge
3W–3L career · 6 lines in 2026
9%89%1%
3.19
Leonard Brecken
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Todd Paris
28W–47L career · 3 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.16
Kirk Tatge
6W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.14
Kenji Krzywosz
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.