Teams

Ali Ducharme

2026 Columbia Adult Mixed 18 & Over League · 8.0 Mixed Doubles

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MISSOURI

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-07-30vs April EdwardsLost 02
L#1 DoublesLaurie Everett / Kevin Everett vs Pam McAllister / Will McAllister6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAli DuCharme / Jon Ducharme vs Carolyn Spencer / Alberto Gonzalez Lopez2-6, 1-6
2026-07-27vs April EdwardsLost 03
L#1 DoublesHang Du / Mihail Popescu vs April Edwards / Jaden Hanson1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesReagan Brown / Tyler Helton vs Pam McAllister / Will McAllister1-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesAli DuCharme / Jon Ducharme vs Karen Thies / Stan Jastrzebski3-6, 4-6
2026-07-25vs April EdwardsLost 12
L#1 DoublesHang Du / Jon Ducharme vs April Edwards / S Hasan Naqvi3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAli DuCharme / John Augustine vs Carolyn Spencer / Alberto Gonzalez Lopez2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesLaurie Everett / Kevin Everett vs Pam McAllister / Kamlendra Singh6-1, 6-4
2026-07-23vs April EdwardsLost 03
L#1 DoublesLaurie Everett / Kevin Everett vs Karen Thies / Stan Jastrzebski2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAli DuCharme / Jon Ducharme vs April Edwards / S Hasan Naqvi0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesHang Du / John Augustine vs Pam McAllister / Jaden Hanson0-6, 0-6
2026-07-13vs April EdwardsLost 02
L#1 DoublesAli DuCharme / Jon Ducharme vs Carolyn Spencer / Stan Jastrzebski1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesReagan Brown / Tyler Helton vs Pam McAllister / Will McAllister1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.0 Mixed Doubles
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1April Edwards50141261
2Ali Ducharme0511428175

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Laurie Everett
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.10
Ali DuCharme
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Hang Du
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.03
Reagan Brown
published
Jon Ducharme
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Kevin Everett
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Mihail Popescu
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Tyler Helton
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kevin Everett + Laurie Everett12953% gamesnot enough data
Ali DuCharme + Jon Ducharme044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laurie Everett
47W–49L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Ali DuCharme
2W–13L career · 6 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.10
Hang Du
0W–9L career · 7 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.08
Reagan Brown
5W–9L career · no lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
3.03
Jon Ducharme
1W–7L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kevin Everett
18W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mihail Popescu
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Tyler Helton
3W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.