Teams

Yadkin/Clay/40+ 3.5 Mixed

2026 Yadkin Valley Mixed 40 & Over · Mixed 3.5 - Monday Evening

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-07-27vs Yadkin/White/OTC/40+ 3.5 MixedWon 21
W#1 DoublesJeff Clay / Sarah Kaplan vs Anthony Peters / Ashley Peters7-5, 2-0
L#2 DoublesDrew Gerstmyer / Erika Zimmerman vs Drew Plonk / Abigail Plonk6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAustin Temple / Lucie Temple vs JoAnn White / Brent White6-1, 6-1
2026-07-20vs Yadkin/Tatum/40+3.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesRichard Emmendorfer / Casey Emmendorfer vs Aravindh Raj Sankara Narayanan / Jocelyn Moye4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesChris Blankenship / Erika Zimmerman vs James Richards / Clarissa Tatum6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesAustin Temple / Lucie Temple vs Daniel Johnson / Kristi Nicholson1-6, 1-6
2026-07-19vs Yadkin/White/OTC/40+ 3.5 MixedWon 21
W#1 DoublesChris Blankenship / Nancy Hart vs Dixon Douglas / Gaines Douglas7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLucie Temple / Austin Temple vs Ashley Peters / Anthony Peters6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesErika Zimmerman / Drew Gerstmyer vs Katie Thompson / David Thompson6-1, 6-4
2026-07-15vs Yadkin/Backus-Araujo/40+3.5Won 20
W#2 DoublesLucie Temple / Austin Temple vs Dean Burkhalter / Dudley Commander Burkhalter6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesDrew Gerstmyer / Erika Zimmerman vs Paul Howard / Nikki Francis6-0, 6-0
2026-07-01vs Yadkin/Backus-Araujo/40+3.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesJeff Clay / Sarah Kaplan vs Jacobo Araujo Nieto / Linda Lowman1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChris Blankenship / Katelyn Chapman vs David Crews / Nikki Francis6-4, 6-2
2026-06-29vs Yadkin/Tatum/40+3.5Won 21
L#1 DoublesJeff Clay / Sarah Kaplan vs Meghan de Young / Andrew Backus1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesCasey Emmendorfer / Richard Emmendorfer vs James Richards / Laura Varsik2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChris Blankenship / Katelyn Chapman vs Kim Haynes / Eric Stillson6-4, 6-4
2026-06-15vs Yadkin/White/OTC/40+ 3.5 MixedWon 30
W#1 DoublesChris Blankenship / Nancy Hart vs Hub Orr / Andi Orr7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJeff Clay / Sarah Kaplan vs David Thompson / Katie Thompson6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAustin Temple / Lucie Temple vs Gaines Douglas / Dixon Douglas7-5, 6-4
2026-06-08vs Yadkin/Tatum/40+3.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesLucie Temple / Austin Temple vs Daniel Johnson / Kristi Nicholson2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesErika Zimmerman / Drew Gerstmyer vs Andrew Backus / Danielle Wright1-6, 1-6
2026-06-01vs Yadkin/Backus-Araujo/40+3.5Lost 12
W#1 DoublesNancy Hart / Chris Blankenship vs Margaret Johnson / Paul Howard7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesErika Zimmerman / Drew Gerstmyer vs Amy Backus / Jacobo Araujo Nieto6-0, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCasey Emmendorfer / Richard Emmendorfer vs Linda Lowman / Manas Mishra3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mixed 3.5 - Monday Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Casey Emmendorfer
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.45
Katelyn Chapman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.40
Jeff Clay
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.40
Lucie Temple
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.38
Richard Emmendorfer
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.36
Drew Gerstmyer
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.30
Sarah Kaplan
published
3.27
Austin Temple
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Nancy Hart
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Erika Zimmerman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Austin Temple + Lucie Temple7652% games+2.3% vs expected
Richard Emmendorfer + Casey Emmendorfer6349% games−1.9% vs expected
Erika Zimmerman + Drew Gerstmyer2356% gamesnot enough data
Katelyn Chapman + Jeff Clay123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Casey Emmendorfer
45W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
3.56
Katelyn Chapman
53W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.45
Jeff Clay
37W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.40
Lucie Temple
31W–22L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.40
Richard Emmendorfer
14W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.38
Drew Gerstmyer
10W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.36
Sarah Kaplan
3W–1L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Austin Temple
15W–17L career · 6 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Nancy Hart
33W–32L career · 3 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.13
Erika Zimmerman
4W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.