Teams

LCC - Crenshaw/Phillips

Polk Casual League · Polk Ladies Casual Play Fall 2.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.08 / REGION_4

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Polk Ladies Casual Play Fall 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Kerrie Hall
published
3.43
Brittany Craig
published 3.5
3.25
Lauren Clark
published
3.04
Lauren Lloyd
published
3.04
Caroline Miller
published 3
2.78
Sheryl Norman
usually #1 Doubles 29%, also #3 Doubles 21% · published
Courtney Larson
published 3
2.65
Brandy Lansford
published 3
2.65
Lamanda Petcoff
published
2.62
2.61
Lauren Albaum
published
2.53
Rachel Hollis
published
2.47
Hilary Crenshaw
published 3
2.44
Leah Grieger
published
Sylvia Berke
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Lloyd + Caroline Miller314 matchesnot enough data
Hilary Crenshaw + Courtney Phillips033 matchesnot enough data
Lauren Lloyd + Lauren Albaum123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kerrie Hall
38W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%24%76%
3.59
3.5
Brittany Craig
19W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
3.43
Lauren Clark
10W–7L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Lauren Lloyd
13W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%38%62%
3.04
3
Caroline Miller
20W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%38%62%
3.04
Sheryl Norman
53W–65L career · 12 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
2.78
3
Courtney Larson
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Brandy Lansford
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
2.65
Lamanda Petcoff
2W–8L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
2.65
3
Courtney Phillips
2W–8L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
2.62
Lauren Albaum
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
2.61
Rachel Hollis
2W–8L career · no lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
2.53
3
Hilary Crenshaw
2W–10L career · no lines in 2022
59%41%<1%
2.47
Leah Grieger
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
67%33%<1%
2.44
Sylvia Berke
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.