Teams

Ch.Brown18C

2025 Capital Combo 18 & Over · 8.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 4.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-09-28vs La.Brock18CLost 01
L#2 DoublesAndrew Dinicola / Andrew Pham vs Patrick Newsome / Nicolas Quevedo3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-09-28vs Co.Vinson18CWon 10
W#1 DoublesMatthew Southern / Andrew Dinicola vs Raymond Xu / Patrick Shields6-2, 6-2
2025-09-14vs Br.Eckles18CLost 01
L#3 DoublesBrendon Dorgan / Andrew Dinicola vs Herman Gudjonson / Hunter Bassett2-6, 6-7
2025-08-10vs Ma.Wiggs18CSplit 11
W#2 DoublesDavis Felts / Matthew Southern vs John Preiss / Joel Miles6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAndrew Dinicola / Frank Moser vs Matt Wiggs / James McCaskill1-6, 4-6
2025-07-27vs Je.Monaghen18CWon 10
W#2 DoublesAndrew Dinicola / Brendon Dorgan vs William Jackson / Scott Arra6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.08 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.46
Bruce Mildwurf
published 4.5
4.45
Jeff Vajay
published
4.40
Andrew Dinicola
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
4.35
Kevin Powell
published
4.22
Matthew Southern
published
4.11
Davis Felts
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.88
Kevin Wolborsky
published
3.87
EJ Mildwurf
published
3.80
Brendon Dorgan
published 4
3.72
Mark Camacho
published
3.61
Frank Moser
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrew Dinicola + Davis Felts6746% games+0.8% vs expected
EJ Mildwurf + Bruce Mildwurf134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Bruce Mildwurf
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
4.46
Jeff Vajay
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
4.45
4.5
Andrew Dinicola
45W–44L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
4.40
Kevin Powell
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%15%
4.35
Matthew Southern
11W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
4.22
4.5
Davis Felts
63W–95L career · 3 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
4.11
Kevin Wolborsky
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.88
EJ Mildwurf
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
82%18%<1%
3.87
4
Brendon Dorgan
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
Mark Camacho
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Frank Moser
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.61

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.