Teams

ATC - SOT 1 Jimenez

2026 Tri Level Men · 4.0,3.5,3.0

19 players · average NTRP 3.40 / SOUTHERN REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-20vs ATC - SOT 2 JimenezWon 10
W#3 DoublesJeffrey Jimenez / Justin Greenberg vs Divesh Mehta / Phillip Raclyn0-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-03-15vs Sportime Lake IsleLost 01
L#3 DoublesChristopher Wood / Justin Greenberg vs Jeffrey Winner / STEFAN ANDREEV2-6, 1-6
2026-03-07vs ATC - SOT 2 JimenezWon 10
W#3 DoublesYongxin Li / Jong Cha vs Phillip Raclyn / Charles Sears7-6, 6-2
2026-02-27vs NRRCSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMax Borchert / Nathan Kerxhalli vs Adam Ashcraft / Won Choe7-6, 7-6
L#3 DoublesJong Cha / Christopher Wood vs Anbo Zhou / Harry Kim1-6, 5-7
2026-02-21vs Chestnut Ridge Team NameLost 02
L#1 DoublesMarian Pavlus / Ravilochan Pola vs Josh Faust / Robert Bull6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJeffrey Jimenez / James Bria III vs Nick Santucci / Christopher Jensen1-6, 2-6
2026-02-01vs LIFETIME ATHLETIC TribreakersLost 02
L#2 DoublesNikhil Mahajan / Davon Weeks vs Frederick Kincheloe / Dean Hoffman2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesYongxin Li / Justin Greenberg vs Marcello Hallake / Peter Gannon5-7, 4-6
2026-01-23vs TCH:Trilogies26Lost 02
L#1 DoublesRavilochan Pola / Stephen Dantu vs David Packer / Sharad Singhani1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesChristopher Wood / Justin Greenberg vs Brooks Ballard / Matthew Cummings2-6, 1-6
2026-01-09vs WTC: Tri-4.0 Triple TakesSplit 11
L#2 DoublesKevin Bedoya / Davon Weeks vs Hector Rodriguez / Marc Aylett3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesYongxin Li / Jong Cha vs Daniel Aller / John Bentley6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0,3.5,3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Andrew Katims
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Marian Pavlus
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Stephen Dantu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Ravilochan Pola
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.41
Luis M Jimenez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.41
Max Borchert
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Prateek Gahoi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Kevin Bedoya
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Ashutosh Shankar
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.13
Nikhil Mahajan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Jong Cha
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
Nathan Kerxhalli
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
James Bria III
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.03
Davon Weeks
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.96
Yongxin Li
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Jeffrey Jimenez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.70
Justin Greenberg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.65
Christopher Wood
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Richard Chin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nathan Kerxhalli + Max Borchert3446% games+2.2% vs expected
Yongxin Li + Jong Cha6074% gamesnot enough data
Ashutosh Shankar + Nikhil Mahajan303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andrew Katims
8W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Marian Pavlus
2W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.62
Stephen Dantu
4W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.60
Ravilochan Pola
32W–60L career · 2 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
3.50
Luis M Jimenez
51W–102L career · 1 line in 2026
75%25%<1%
3.41
Max Borchert
24W–31L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.41
Prateek Gahoi
40W–44L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.28
Kevin Bedoya
41W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Ashutosh Shankar
87W–51L career · 4 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.14
Nikhil Mahajan
52W–47L career · 1 line in 2026
15%85%<1%
3.13
Jong Cha
16W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%23%77%
3.10
Nathan Kerxhalli
31W–31L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%30%70%
3.07
3
James Bria III
57W–41L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.05
3.5
Davon Weeks
2W–28L career · 2 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.03
Yongxin Li
18W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
2.96
Jeffrey Jimenez
14W–53L career · 2 lines in 2026
>99%<1%0%
2.78
Justin Greenberg
3W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
>99%<1%0%
2.70
3
Christopher Wood
0W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
2.65
Richard Chin
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.