Teams

MARION/Steed/Women/7.5

2022 Marion Combo 18 & Over · 7.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-12-02vs FK - SlattonWon 10
W#1 DoublesEileen Lombardo / Dina Sapienza vs Hera Peterson / Loni Rahn6-0, 6-1
2022-11-11vs FK - Hit and RunWon 20
W#1 DoublesDebby Watts / Susan Atwell vs Nneka Nwakoby / Nicole Millsaps6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBeth Riendeau / Eileen Lombardo vs Kimberly Brewer / Hollie Powell6-2, 6-0
2022-10-30vs FK - Hit and RunWon 10
W#3 DoublesDebby Watts / Susan Atwell vs Diana Royo / Nneka Nwakoby4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-10-21vs FK - Hit and RunWon 10
W#1 DoublesEileen Lombardo / Beth Riendeau vs Sharon Christie Ybanez / Terri Finn6-1, 6-4
2022-10-14Won 10
W#2 DoublesBeth Riendeau / Eileen Lombardo vs Natalie Slatton / Leigh McPherson6-0, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Tanner Watts
published
3.86
Eileen Lombardo
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.81
Debby Watts
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.80
Caroline Murray
published 4
3.77
Beth Riendeau
published 4
3.64
Lisa Steed
published
3.61
Susan Atwell
published
3.48
Dina Sapienza
published 4
Jennifer Boyd
published
Jennifer Hewitson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eileen Lombardo + Dina Sapienza314 matchesnot enough data
Beth Riendeau + Susan Atwell123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tanner Watts
4W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%19%
3.89
4
Eileen Lombardo
304W–158L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.86
4
Debby Watts
186W–79L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Caroline Murray
13W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Beth Riendeau
8W–6L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
Lisa Steed
15W–10L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.64
Susan Atwell
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.61
4
Dina Sapienza
8W–7L career · no lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
3.48
Jennifer Boyd
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jennifer Hewitson
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.