Teams

LT YELLOW

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - NOCO · WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER - NOCO

8 players · average NTRP 3.75 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-07-19vs FCCCLost 01
L#2 DoublesJudy O'Gorman / Anja Mau vs Lynn Clay / Dierdre Sadeh2-6, 3-6
2021-07-16vs CSUWon 10
W#3 DoublesJudy O'Gorman / Cynthia McGrorey vs Darla Beutler / Dina Rank6-4, 6-0
2021-07-05vs HMTC TURQUOISESplit 11
L#1 DoublesJudy O'Gorman / Cynthia McGrorey vs Gail Draper / Renee Carlson1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSiriporn McDaniel / Anja Mau vs Susan Holland / Kelley Hoime6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2021-06-28vs CSUSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAnja Mau / Mischel Ebon Libunao vs Karen Chancellor / Wendy Clark0-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesPat Murphy-Ebersole / Judy O'Gorman vs Pat Athey / Darla Beutler6-1, 6-1
2021-06-21vs LVTA PURPLELost 02
L#1 DoublesMischel Ebon Libunao / Anja Mau vs Laurel McClellan / Catherine Costlow6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCynthia McGrorey / Judy O'Gorman vs Amy Dykstal / Jennifer Schafer4-6, 6-0, 0-1
2021-06-14vs FCCCLost 01
L#1 DoublesMischel Ebon Libunao / Anja Mau vs Robin Bachelet / Amanda Repert4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Rachel Robertson
published
3.52
Cynthia McGrorey
published 4
3.50
Anja Mau
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.43
Denise Andrews
published 3.5
3.23
Judy O'Gorman
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Pat Murphy-Ebersole
published
Siriporn McDaniel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anja Mau + Cynthia McGrorey8947% games+3.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rachel Robertson
38W–67L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%2%
3.72
4
Cynthia McGrorey
17W–39L career · no lines in 2021
44%56%<1%
3.52
4
Anja Mau
55W–100L career · 5 lines in 2021
50%50%<1%
3.50
3.5
Denise Andrews
35W–32L career · no lines in 2021
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Judy O'Gorman
58W–79L career · 5 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
Mischel Ebon Libunao
16W–22L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Pat Murphy-Ebersole
8W–13L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Siriporn McDaniel
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.