Teams

OC RCIrvine- Ly - Sat 1230

2026 SCTA Tri-Level 18 & Over - OC · OC Women - 3.5 - 4.0 - 4.5 Weekend

25 players · average NTRP 3.94 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 upcoming · 9 played
Sep 5 12:30 PM
Racquet Club of Irvine
L#1 DoublesTricia Christen / Nina Berry vs Alissa Ahlman / Tristen Nugent6-7, 3-5
2026-08-29vs OC Irvine LPC - Lisa - Sat9Won 30
W#1 DoublesMichelle Hay / Jenna van der Meyden vs Lisa Nguyen / Mina Whitlock6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHuyen Tran / Vera Garrard vs Gia Bao Le / Rachel Om7-6, 3-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKellie Binder / Christina Spiezia vs Connie Chen / Leslie Nguyen6-0, 6-3
L#1 DoublesNina Berry / Christy Julianel vs Megan Riley / Renee Walton5-7, 1-6
2026-08-15vs OC LPC - NishaWon 21
W#1 DoublesNina Berry / Hannah Bradvica vs Pat Papartassee / Sabrina MacLachlan6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMercedes Natvig / Lily Pham vs Daniela Schardinger / Michelle Smith2-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAmy Ching / Christine Bullette vs Casey Nardi / Maria Valera0-6, 3-6
2026-08-08vs OC Monarch Butterflies - ElyzWon 21
W#1 DoublesMelissa Hoang / Dawn Ringo vs Kim Tran / Valentina Stepanova6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSayuri Maruna / Yumiko Tokiwa vs Kathy Salter / Katherine Sexton7-6, 7-5
L#3 DoublesAdrianne de Castro / Kellie Binder vs Felicia Jao / Daria Stepanova2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-08-07vs OC Cabrillo - Stacy - Sun8amWon 10
W#1 DoublesNina Berry / Tricia Christen vs Kelly Ford / Emalyn Anthony7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2026-08-01vs OC Costa Mesa TC - Yolanda - Sat9Won 30
W#1 DoublesLy Diem Nguyen Kursits / Hannah Bradvica vs Chi Rauen / Theresa Jeong6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMercedes Natvig / Vera Garrard vs Daniela Gavaldon / Paige Sturley6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChristina Spiezia / Aydee Paredes vs Irene Fehr / Kelly Huarte7-5, 6-0
2026-07-25vs OC Fullerton - JosephineWon 21
L#1 DoublesJenna van der Meyden / Hannah Bradvica vs Vivian Ly / Daniela Chung1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLily Pham / Vera Garrard vs Tracy Lee / Clarissa Htay6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJudith Chung / Yukiyo Matsushita vs Emily Ashby / Candice Lee6-1, 6-1
L#1 DoublesMelissa Hoang / Ly Diem Nguyen Kursits vs Janet Lin / Michele Mouttapa1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesAydee Paredes / Georgina Rojas vs Cassie Hadfield / Chelsea van Niekerk3-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · OC Women - 3.5 - 4.0 - 4.5 Weekend
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OC Costa Mesa TC - Yolanda - Sat9419614120
2OC Monarch Butterflies - Elyz2172668
3OC RCIrvine- Ly - Sat 12302163977
4OC Cute on the Court - LPC - Mak Sun9225716113
5OC Irvine LPC - Lisa - Sat912361390
6OC Cabrillo - Stacy - Sun8am133920131
7OC Fullerton - Josephine0224853

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 24 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.22
Jenna van der Meyden
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.21
Melissa Hoang
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.20
Ly Diem Nguyen Kursits
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.17
Nina Berry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.03
Dawn Ringo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.03
Hannah Bradvica
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.94
Yumiko Tokiwa
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.88
Sayuri Maruna
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.79
Huyen Tran
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.77
Lily Pham
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Vera Garrard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Bonnie Lee
published 4
3.74
Michelle Hay
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.70
Mercedes Natvig
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.53
Christina Spiezia
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.49
Tara Joseph
published
3.36
Yukiyo Matsushita
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Aydee Paredes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Ashley Hay
published 3.5
3.31
Kellie Binder
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Adrianne de Castro
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Judith Chung
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.24
Georgina Rojas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Amy Ching
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Christine Bullette
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Georgina Rojas + Aydee Paredes12263% games+12.8% vs expected
Yumiko Tokiwa + Sayuri Maruna13757% games+2.3% vs expected
Yumiko Tokiwa + Vera Garrard22559% games−0.7% vs expected
Kellie Binder + Adrianne de Castro4352% games−4.9% vs expected
Amy Ching + Christine Bullette9852% gamesnot enough data
Yumiko Tokiwa + Ly Diem Nguyen Kursits303 matchesnot enough data
Yumiko Tokiwa + Nina Berry303 matchesnot enough data
Mercedes Natvig + Vera Garrard213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Jenna van der Meyden
78W–45L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
4.22
Melissa Hoang
9W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
4.21
4.5
Ly Diem Nguyen Kursits
84W–76L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
4.20
4.5
Nina Berry
112W–62L career · 4 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
4.17
4.5
Dawn Ringo
4W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
42%58%<1%
4.03
4.5
Hannah Bradvica
2W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
4.03
4
Yumiko Tokiwa
209W–92L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.94
4
Sayuri Maruna
90W–56L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.88
Huyen Tran
13W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%2%98%
3.79
Lily Pham
18W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%3%97%
3.77
4
Vera Garrard
110W–54L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Bonnie Lee
1W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Michelle Hay
2W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%4%96%
3.74
Mercedes Natvig
11W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%8%92%
3.70
3.5
Christina Spiezia
15W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.53
Tara Joseph
5W–6L career · no lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
3.49
3.5
Yukiyo Matsushita
46W–37L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.36
3.5
Aydee Paredes
18W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Ashley Hay
7W–4L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Kellie Binder
29W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Adrianne de Castro
11W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%8%
3.31
Judith Chung
12W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%4%96%
3.25
Georgina Rojas
12W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Amy Ching
44W–57L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Christine Bullette
56W–52L career · 1 line in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.