Teams

Wilson/18/7.5/Combo/OCC

2025 LAF Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Night · 7.5 Laf (18&O) Women Night

12 players · average NTRP 3.83 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-09-22vs Dendy/18/7.5/Combo/YSCWon 30
W#1 DoublesAlaina Wilson / Victoria Knott vs Liz Caillier / Angie Cestia6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAshley Cooper / Mary Beth McElligott vs April Bodin / Kay Clark6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLauren DeRouen / Brandee Richardson vs Jenifer Leger Dendy / Elizabeth Felterman6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2025-09-15vs Quinn/18/7.5/Combo/RedsWon 30
W#1 DoublesNicole Bergeron / Emma Vezina vs Nicole Angers / Meng DePriest6-2, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAshley Cooper / Brandee Richardson vs Julie Quinn / Misty Deville6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMelissa Padgett / Faith Hickson vs Mele Gonzales / Madeleine Burch6-0, 6-2
2025-09-12vs Dendy/18/7.5/Combo/YSCWon 30
W#1 DoublesAlaina Wilson / Emma Vezina vs Jenifer Leger Dendy / Jennifer Schopp6-0, 2-1
W#2 DoublesAshley Cooper / Nichole Forstall vs Vicki Tate / Elizabeth Felterman7-5, 7-6
W#3 DoublesBrandee Richardson / Laura Wiggins vs Angie Cestia / Kay Clark6-4, 6-2
2025-08-18vs Quinn/18/7.5/Combo/RedsLost 12
L#1 DoublesFaith Hickson / Brandee Richardson vs Julie Quinn / Misty Deville1-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMelissa Padgett / Mary Beth McElligott vs Nicole Angers / Meng DePriest6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAlaina Wilson / Lauren DeRouen vs Mele Gonzales / Crystal Meaux2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Laf (18&O) Women Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Melissa Padgett
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.78
Alaina Wilson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.77
Mary Beth McElligott
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.68
Nicole Bergeron
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.65
Brandee Richardson
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.51
Laura Wiggins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Nichole Forstall
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.30
Faith Hickson
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.28
Corina Melancon
published 4
3.18
Victoria Knott
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.13
Lauren DeRouen
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
Emma Vezina
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Faith Hickson + Brandee Richardson5168% games+15.1% vs expected
Nichole Forstall + Brandee Richardson5068% games+7.5% vs expected
Lauren DeRouen + Brandee Richardson5354% games+7.3% vs expected
Nichole Forstall + Faith Hickson5546% games−5.6% vs expected
Faith Hickson + Victoria Knott134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melissa Padgett
24W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.89
4
Alaina Wilson
7W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
Mary Beth McElligott
22W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Nicole Bergeron
23W–18L career · 5 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.68
3.5
Brandee Richardson
46W–13L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%14%86%
3.65
Laura Wiggins
8W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.51
Nichole Forstall
29W–32L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%87%13%
3.34
Faith Hickson
39W–29L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
4
Corina Melancon
10W–22L career · no lines in 2025
94%6%<1%
3.28
Victoria Knott
19W–30L career · 5 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Lauren DeRouen
11W–19L career · 7 lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.13
Emma Vezina
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.