Teams

Je.Brooks18A

2024 Capital Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.90 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-04-23vs Ma.Gregson18ALost 02
L#1 SinglesAaron Heil vs Daniel Gallo1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKevin Abourisk / Mario Covarrubias vs Chris Wasko / Dan Podrasky4-6, 4-6
2024-04-16vs Dy.DeMacy18AWon 30
W#1 DoublesChris Mauro / Daniel Hill vs Scott Cruikshank / David Peters6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAaron Heil vs John Gouveia6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJeffrey Brooks / Kevin Abourisk vs Frank Allison / Douglas Marks6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2024-04-09vs Je.Monaghen18AWon 20
W#1 SinglesAaron Heil vs Jeffrey Monaghen6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKevin Abourisk / Jeffrey Brooks vs Jeff Abercrombie / Omar EL-Kaissi7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2024-04-02vs Ra.Xu18AWon 21
W#1 SinglesAaron Heil vs Ryan Sheppard7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKevin Abourisk / Ken Glanville vs Patrick Grant / Seth Layton3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesTimothy Koves / Gregory Isabwa vs Duane Bryant / Ivan Andjelkovic6-3, 6-0
2024-03-19Won 10
W#1 SinglesAaron Heil vs Charles Perretti6-2, 6-3
2024-03-12vs Ry.Berliner18ALost 02
L#2 DoublesMike Sellers / Chris Mauro vs Ryan Berliner / Nicholas Lau3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesKevin Abourisk vs Visakan Jayakumar4-6, 0-6
2024-03-05vs Ad.Dailey18ALost 02
L#2 DoublesTyler Smith / Kevin Abourisk vs Jonathan Adams / Bradford Minsley3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesChris Mauro / Ken Glanville vs Adam Dailey / Joe Neylan7-5, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Gregory Isabwa
published
3.79
Daniel Hill
published 4
3.78
William Caldwell
published
3.74
Aaron Heil
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.67
Chris Mauro
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.58
Kevin Abourisk
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.47
Timothy Koves
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.42
Ken Glanville
published
3.37
Mike Sellers
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chris Mauro + Timothy Koves5256% gamesnot enough data
Kevin Abourisk + Aaron Heil314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Gregory Isabwa
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
93%7%<1%
3.79
4
Daniel Hill
8W–6L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.79
William Caldwell
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Aaron Heil
72W–27L career · 5 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Chris Mauro
37W–19L career · 3 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Kevin Abourisk
40W–56L career · 6 lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.58
3.5
Timothy Koves
232W–124L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
3.47
Ken Glanville
18W–23L career · no lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
3.42
Mike Sellers
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
82%18%<1%
3.37

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.