Teams

Di.Williams40C

2024 Capital Combo 40 & Over · 6.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-09-18vs Me.Ferrell40CSplit 11
W#2 DoublesDiane Williams / Elisebeth Gelardi vs Melissa Ferrell / Amy Baker6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesJorgelina Stroud / Cindy McCullough vs Patricia Weston / Caroline Wall2-6, 4-6
2024-09-11vs Ka.Percy40CLost 12
W#1 DoublesLaurie Reiss / Lorraine Hall vs Katherine Canavan / Jennifer Kazmierczak7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCindy McCullough / Laurie Compiano vs Katie Percy / Marilyn Slaymaker5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesElisebeth Gelardi / Rebecca Edwards vs Mariana Lima Gonzalez / Emma Coblentz1-6, 3-6
2024-09-04vs Jo.Zorzi40CWon 20
W#1 DoublesLaurie Reiss / Whitley Morris vs Sharon Cole / Janet Hammond6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRebecca Edwards / Joan Faulkner vs Jodi Zorzi / Heather Word6-3, 6-1
2024-08-28vs Mi.Spangenberg40CSplit 11
W#1 DoublesElisebeth Gelardi / Jessie Brinkley vs Brigette Flower / Becky King6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesTracy Owens / Laurie Compiano vs Amy Kell / Linda Chuang1-6, 0-6
2024-08-27vs Pa.Cochran40CWon 20
W#1 DoublesLaurie Compiano / Laurie Reiss vs Amy Ellis / Lisa Lathram6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesElisebeth Gelardi / Jorgelina Stroud vs Paula Cochran / Mary Ann Enzweiler6-1, 6-2
2024-08-21vs Ch.Kopp40CSplit 11
L#1 DoublesElisebeth Gelardi / Whitley Morris vs Holly Camak / Jerri Lemanski3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLaurie Reiss / Diane Williams vs Brooke Abee / Inma Navarro Galisteo6-2, 6-1
2024-08-14vs Ch.Burr40CWon 30
W#1 DoublesElisebeth Gelardi / Whitley Morris vs Camille Conzola / Julie Liddle6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesChequetta Ann Nobles Hall / Jorgelina Stroud vs Lynelle Clark / Olga Stephens4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLaurie Reiss / Lorraine Hall vs Christine Burr / Julie Brigham6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Lorraine Hall
published
3.44
Elisebeth Gelardi
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.28
3.27
Joan Faulkner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Jessie Brinkley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Laurie Reiss
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.14
Cindy McCullough
published 3.5
3.13
Tracy Owens
published
3.10
Whitley Morris
published
2.79
Laurie Compiano
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.64
Jorgelina Stroud
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elisebeth Gelardi + Laurie Reiss6259% games+9.4% vs expected
Laurie Compiano + Laurie Reiss6353% gamesnot enough data
Jorgelina Stroud + Jessie Brinkley5356% gamesnot enough data
Jorgelina Stroud + Laurie Reiss3253% gamesnot enough data
Joan Faulkner + Laurie Reiss303 matchesnot enough data
Chequetta Ann Nobles Hall + Laurie Compiano123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lorraine Hall
50W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%5%95%
3.74
3.5
Elisebeth Gelardi
97W–87L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Chequetta Ann Nobles Hall
16W–16L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Joan Faulkner
69W–72L career · 1 line in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Jessie Brinkley
120W–101L career · 1 line in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Laurie Reiss
234W–202L career · 5 lines in 2024
14%86%1%
3.15
3.5
Cindy McCullough
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.14
Tracy Owens
1W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%18%82%
3.13
Whitley Morris
10W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%23%77%
3.10
3
Laurie Compiano
45W–71L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Jorgelina Stroud
121W–177L career · 3 lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
2.64

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.