Teams

SGV Dare Doubles-Flores-WN/SA12

2023 Adult Division - 18 & Over San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Men 4.5

15 players · average NTRP 4.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-06-24Lost 01
L#1 DoublesEVAN CHANG / Ky Vo vs Chirag Jain / Nathaniel Israel7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2023-06-17Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKeith Vazquez / EVAN CHANG vs Peter Gertmenian / Arman Davtyan2-6, 3-6
2023-06-11Lost 01
L#2 DoublesEVAN CHANG / Thinh Le vs Randy Tang / Rex Tseng6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJason Wang / EVAN CHANG vs Chirag Jain / Joey Takehara2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Men 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.01 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.37
Eric Gyi
published
4.30
ISMAEL RODRIGUEZ
published
4.28
Adrian Belcher
published 4.5
Chad Cruz
published 4.5
4.18
Maki Potes
published
3.96
Ryan Cox
published
3.94
EVAN CHANG
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.88
Ky Vo
published
3.66
Keith Vazquez
published
3.55
Joseph Widman
published
Jermaine Montgomery
published
Richard Tellez
published
Thinh Le
published
Victor Burga
published
Wesley Wang
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Adrian Belcher + Eric Gyi303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Eric Gyi
20W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
4.37
ISMAEL RODRIGUEZ
18W–10L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
4.30
4.5
Adrian Belcher
6W–1L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
4.28
4.5
Chad Cruz
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Maki Potes
8W–5L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
4.18
Ryan Cox
15W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%<1%>99%
3.96
4.5
EVAN CHANG
97W–139L career · 4 lines in 2023
67%33%<1%
3.94
Ky Vo
11W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%<1%>99%
3.88
Keith Vazquez
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%<1%>99%
3.66
Joseph Widman
13W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%<1%>99%
3.55
Jermaine Montgomery
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Richard Tellez
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Thinh Le
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Victor Burga
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Wesley Wang
3W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.