Teams

Vissering - 9.0 18+

2025 Howard Mixed 18 & Over · Howard Mixed 18 & Over 9.0

16 players · average NTRP 4.55 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2025-04-05vs Cha - HoCoCha 9.0 18+Split 11
W#1 DoublesJan Neumann / Nathalie Davis vs Koby Bonta / Jin Lei6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesLukas Sanidas / Alison Bailey vs Jeison de Guzman / Silvana Slusarciuc6-7, 3-6
2025-03-28vs DaRosso Elite 18+ 9.0Won 20
W#2 DoublesJan Neumann / Heather Carr vs Julie Lazer / Mitchell Furst6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJonathan Vissering / Jennifer Mitchell vs Jake Lazer / Mary Jo Roberton6-3, 6-4
2025-03-21vs Trang - 9.0 18+Won 10
W#3 DoublesMatthew Geppi / Jennifer Mitchell vs Chris Miller / Wendy Heger6-4, 6-4
2025-03-09vs DaRosso Elite 18+ 9.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesHeather Carr / Matthew Geppi vs Rachel Martinez / Richard Abruscato6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAngel Batkins / Renaldo Savady vs Julie Lazer / Mitchell Furst6-2, 6-1
2025-02-16vs Trang - 9.0 18+Won 20
W#1 DoublesAna Maria Pena Castro / Matthew Geppi vs Bruce Fulton / Wendy Heger6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesNathalie Davis / Jonathan Vissering vs Lolita Blair / Dat Doan6-0, 6-1
2025-02-09vs Cha - HoCoCha 9.0 18+Lost 02
L#2 DoublesLukas Sanidas / Dao Phan-Vissering vs Koby Bonta / Jin Lei2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJonathan Vissering / Jennifer Mitchell vs Silvana Slusarciuc / Jeison de Guzman4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-02-01vs DaRosso Elite 18+ 9.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesMatthew Geppi / Dao Phan-Vissering vs Matthew DaRosso / Rachel Martinez6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRenaldo Savady / Angel Batkins vs Robert Kargus / Tonya Crosley6-2, 6-2
2025-01-24vs Trang - 9.0 18+Won 10
W#3 DoublesDao Phan-Vissering / Lukas Sanidas vs Elizabeth Balanis / Jay Anzures6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2025-01-18vs Cha - HoCoCha 9.0 18+Won 10
W#3 DoublesAngel Batkins / Renaldo Savady vs Henry Cha / Jean Lim7-5, 6-1
2025-01-10Won 10
W#3 DoublesDao Phan-Vissering / Matthew Geppi vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-01-05vs Trang - 9.0 18+Won 20
W#1 DoublesNathalie Davis / Matthew Geppi vs Wendy Heger / KHOURY ZIAD6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesHeather Carr / Jan Neumann vs Anthony Carle / Malika Rasheed7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Mixed 18 & Over 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.28 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.80
Angel Batkins
published 5
4.71
Austin Blake
published 5
4.43
Heather Carr
published
4.39
Luis Lozano
published
4.37
Matthew Geppi
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published 4.5
4.30
4.25
Nathan Leslie
published
4.20
Jan Neumann
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.19
Jonathan Vissering
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
4.13
Lukas Sanidas
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.10
Alison Bailey
published 4.5
3.96
Dao Phan-Vissering
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.83
Renaldo Savady
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 4
Hayan Marouf
published
Hung Nguyen
published
Jessica Lee
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jan Neumann + Heather Carr6750% games+0.4% vs expected
Jonathan Vissering + Dao Phan-Vissering81150% gamesnot enough data
Matthew Geppi + Dao Phan-Vissering404 matchesnot enough data
Luis Lozano + Alison Bailey303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Angel Batkins
13W–7L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.80
5
Austin Blake
17W–6L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.71
Heather Carr
40W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
4.43
Luis Lozano
67W–31L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%21%
4.39
4.5
Matthew Geppi
225W–81L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
4.37
4.5
Ana Maria Pena Castro
43W–23L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
4.30
Nathan Leslie
9W–8L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
4.25
4.5
Jan Neumann
89W–60L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
4.20
4.5
Jonathan Vissering
357W–182L career · 8 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
4.19
4.5
Lukas Sanidas
142W–110L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
4.13
4.5
Alison Bailey
23W–23L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
4.10
4.5
Dao Phan-Vissering
232W–271L career · 4 lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
3.96
4
Renaldo Savady
224W–182L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
Hayan Marouf
10W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Hung Nguyen
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jessica Lee
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.