Teams

FH Sweetspots - C. Deming

2023 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over ESL · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_3

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 DoublesJesse Glassford / Carol Guido vs Tobey Hartigan / Lisa Nero6-0, 6-2
2022-10-31vs Yachty By Nature - A. RockwoodLost 01
L#1 DoublesMonica Eiermann / Carol Guido vs Sharmila Seth / Lyda Lindell3-6, 6-7
W#1 DoublesMonica Eiermann / Carol Guido vs Jana Alexander / Ulrica Fraley7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2022-10-11vs FishHawk Matchmakers - N. EvansLost 01
L#1 DoublesMonica Eiermann / Carol Guido vs Kelly Mamott / Nicole Evans3-6, 3-6
2022-10-10vs River Hills Raquettes - J. O'LearyLost 01
L#1 DoublesCarol Guido / Susan MOSHER vs Wendy Dobreff / Julie Falanga1-6, 5-7
2022-09-19vs Harbour Island - A. FlahertyWon 10
W#1 DoublesMonica Eiermann / Carol Guido vs Kimberly Camacho / Yeon Thomas6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Jesse Glassford
published
3.19
Kelly Powell
published
3.16
Carol Guido
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.10
Ginger Anzalone
published
3.02
Melissa Collier
published
2.99
Danielle Cunningham
published 3.5
2.97
Carrie Deming
published 3.5
2.95
Giselle Miller
published
2.93
STEPHANIE Hardin
published
2.80
Susan MOSHER
published
Monica Eiermann
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Giselle Miller + Kelly Powell134 matchesnot enough data
Ginger Anzalone + Jesse Glassford123 matchesnot enough data
Jesse Glassford + Kelly Powell213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jesse Glassford
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
Kelly Powell
3W–9L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Carol Guido
232W–215L career · 10 lines in 2023
13%87%1%
3.16
Ginger Anzalone
4W–11L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.10
Melissa Collier
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%45%55%
3.02
3.5
Danielle Cunningham
9W–17L career · type A · no lines in 2023
52%48%<1%
2.99
3.5
Carrie Deming
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
2.97
Giselle Miller
1W–9L career · no lines in 2023
63%37%<1%
2.95
STEPHANIE Hardin
6W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
2.93
Susan MOSHER
16W–18L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
2.80
Monica Eiermann
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.