Teams

St.Clair\Pollock

2023 USTA 60 & OVER TEAM INVITATIONAL · 4.0 PLUS WOMEN

8 players · average NTRP 3.75 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 PLUS WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Diane Iuliano
published 4
3.57
Jane St Clair
published
3.45
Rhonda Wasinger
published
3.42
Tammy Pollock
published
3.40
Alice Dant
published 3.5
3.27
Mary Cole
published
Laurie Lyons
published
Sandra Heeke
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Diane Iuliano
3W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jane St Clair
19W–20L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.57
Rhonda Wasinger
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
64%36%<1%
3.45
Tammy Pollock
41W–45L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
3.42
3.5
Alice Dant
5W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
3.40
Mary Cole
7W–14L career · no lines in 2023
95%5%<1%
3.27
Laurie Lyons
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sandra Heeke
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.