Teams

DBrantmeyer (Park Road)

2023 Adult 55 & Over League · 55 & Over Adult 9.0 Men - Sat PM

8 players · average NTRP 4.10 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-13Won 10
W#2 DoublesBrent Grayson / Jon Post vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-04-29Won 10
W#3 DoublesJay Tiedeman / Jon Post vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-04-22vs RTeat (WSRC)Won 10
W#2 DoublesBo Chriscoe / Dan Brantmeyer vs Randall Miller / Richard Teat6-1, 6-1
2023-04-12vs RTeat (WSRC)Won 20
W#1 DoublesBo Chriscoe / Mark Allen vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJay Tiedeman / William Merlo vs Richard Gallagher / Jim Waud6-0, 6-1
2023-03-18vs RHartley (Sardis)Won 20
W#2 DoublesScott Nichols / Jon Post vs Bobby Mauney / John Trimp6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesDan Brantmeyer / Brent Grayson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-03-11vs RTeat (WSRC)Won 20
W#1 DoublesJay Tiedeman / Brent Grayson vs Daniel Barbu / Jim Waud6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesScott Nichols / Jon Post vs Randall Miller / Martin Iles6-1, 6-0
2023-02-25Won 10
W#1 DoublesVince Quinn / Bo Chriscoe vs Bobby Mauney / Gary Johnson6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult 9.0 Men - Sat PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.91 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.35
Jay Tiedeman
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.01
Bo Chriscoe
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.99
Vince Quinn
published
3.85
William Merlo
published
Brent Grayson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.74
Adam Davis
published 4
3.72
Jon Post
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.68
John England
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bo Chriscoe + Vince Quinn9259% games+1.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Jay Tiedeman
48W–36L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%85%14%
4.35
4
Bo Chriscoe
64W–50L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%48%52%
4.01
Vince Quinn
14W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%53%47%
3.99
William Merlo
7W–6L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%15%
3.85
4
Brent Grayson
58W–36L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Adam Davis
0W–6L career · type S · no lines in 2023
4%92%3%
3.74
4
Jon Post
67W–36L career · 6 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
John England
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.