Teams

Team 1 - Santosh Mohan

2021 Loudoun Adult 18 & Over Mens Winter · Adult 18 & Over Men 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 4.06 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
L#1 DoublesChip Hathaway / Ryan Rohn vs Alan Ogilvie / Bob White2-6, 4-6
2021-04-09Lost 01
L#2 DoublesChris Ford / Barry Dickman vs Sam OBrien / Aaron Thede7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2021-03-26Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMilin Iyer / Ryan Poole vs Tom Bickley / Dariusz Kot3-6, 4-6
2021-03-19vs Team 2 - Sam/GaiellWon 10
W#2 DoublesRyan Rohn / David Todd vs David Le / David Tong6-2, 6-3
2021-03-06vs Team 2 - Sam/GaiellSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBarry Dickman / Chris Ford vs Aaron Thede / Gaiell-Mitchell Kercy6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRyan Rohn / Ryan Poole vs Lonn Larson / Jorge Prieto Choy0-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesDavid Todd / Milin Iyer vs Alan Ogilvie / Soheil Shirzadi7-6, 2-3
W#2 DoublesKrishna Polisetty / Santosh Mohan vs Russ Roberts / Matthew Schenk6-4, 5-5
W#2 DoublesChip Hathaway / Milin Iyer vs Alan Ogilvie / Russ Roberts7-6, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.11
Chip Hathaway
published 4.5
3.86
Jordan Bentley
published
3.85
David Todd
published 4
3.80
Krishna Polisetty
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.76
Brett Burk
published 4
3.75
Todd Gordon
published
3.68
Ryan Rohn
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.63
Chris Ford
published 4
3.62
Barry Dickman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.59
Milin Iyer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.36
Ryan Poole
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Todd + Jordan Bentley4153% games−10.6% vs expected
Ryan Rohn + Milin Iyer3267% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Chip Hathaway
207W–115L career · no lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
4.11
Jordan Bentley
23W–5L career · no lines in 2021
<1%85%14%
3.86
4
David Todd
58W–28L career · no lines in 2021
<1%86%13%
3.85
4
Krishna Polisetty
79W–57L career · 1 line in 2021
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Brett Burk
2W–3L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.76
Todd Gordon
9W–13L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Ryan Rohn
242W–218L career · 3 lines in 2021
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Chris Ford
11W–11L career · no lines in 2021
16%83%<1%
3.63
4
Barry Dickman
90W–123L career · 2 lines in 2021
19%81%<1%
3.62
4
Milin Iyer
99W–128L career · 3 lines in 2021
25%75%<1%
3.59
Ryan Poole
27W–30L career · no lines in 2021
<1%85%14%
3.36
Sudheerkumar Radhakrishnan
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.