Teams

LA - Elysian Tennis Club

2025 USTA MxD 18 & Over - LA · LA - 7.0 Mixed Doubles

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
L#1 DoublesMaxwell Cadena / Natalie Lodwig vs Michael Morrison / Jennifer Foley6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMatthew Perloe / Mina Jun vs Albert Chou / Taylor Phillips0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMarlon Cervantes / Megan Cadena vs Jesse Young / Shauna Cross0-6, 4-6
2025-03-23vs LA - Mulholland Drivers MixedLost 12
L#1 DoublesArthur Moretti / Natalie Lodwig vs Kay Cannon / Zahir McGhee3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMina Jun / Marlon Cervantes vs Kamala Raphael / Jared Houseman4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesRohit Ramachandran / Megan Cadena vs Lenore Zerman / Ethan Goldman6-1, 6-2
2025-02-22vs LA - Ace of SpadesLost 01
L#3 DoublesMatthew Perloe / Kate Davies vs Fshaye Woldemichael / Peryn Darby2-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - 7.0 Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Kate Davies
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.82
Mina Jun
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Meghann Seidner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.71
Anna Floersch
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Arthur Moretti
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Marlon Cervantes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Matthew Perloe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Maxwell Cadena
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Megan Cadena
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Natalie Lodwig
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Rohit Ramachandran
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kate Davies
53W–40L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.54
Mina Jun
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Meghann Seidner
9W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.71
3
Anna Floersch
11W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.71
Arthur Moretti
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Marlon Cervantes
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Matthew Perloe
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Maxwell Cadena
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Megan Cadena
5W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Natalie Lodwig
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rohit Ramachandran
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.