Teams

FOSTER CITY TC/EDGEWATER PK 18AM4.0A

2025 ADULT 18&Over · Men's 4.0

17 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-06-07vs RINCONADA PK 18AM4.0FWon 10
W#1 SinglesEvan Wong vs Hao Jin6-1, 6-0
2025-05-10vs BAY CLUB REDWOOD SHORES 18AM4.0BWon 40
W#1 DoublesTaro Itayama / Shridharan Muthu vs Nick Courtot / Marc Manuel6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesRyan Gabriel vs Alex Terman6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesChristopher Chang / Steven Madrinan vs Raja Gopal / Donald Kung6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesHarish Bharadwaj / Ming Li vs Michael Swire / Teppei Tsutsui6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Harish Bharadwaj
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.00
Ryan Gabriel
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.91
Arthur Costea
published 4
3.91
Henry Lin
published
3.87
Marcelo Celemin
published
3.86
Richard Chang
published
3.82
Shridharan Muthu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.81
Bjorn Fabian
published 4
3.78
Steven Madrinan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Dan Tu
published 4
3.74
Ken Ong
published
3.72
Gino Alimario
published
3.71
Romeo Rodriguez
published
3.71
Evan Wong
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.70
Gilbert Chang
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Shuguang Zhang
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Taro Itayama
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gilbert Chang + Gino Alimario6257% games+6.2% vs expected
Shridharan Muthu + Harish Bharadwaj314 matchesnot enough data
Shridharan Muthu + Ryan Gabriel213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Harish Bharadwaj
5W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%38%62%
4.04
Ryan Gabriel
10W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%50%50%
4.00
4
Arthur Costea
8W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%26%
3.91
Henry Lin
7W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.91
Marcelo Celemin
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.87
Richard Chang
8W–9L career · no lines in 2025
84%16%<1%
3.86
Shridharan Muthu
10W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Bjorn Fabian
10W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
Steven Madrinan
8W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Dan Tu
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Ken Ong
30W–9L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.74
Gino Alimario
11W–8L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.72
Romeo Rodriguez
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
Evan Wong
20W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
Gilbert Chang
15W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Shuguang Zhang
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Taro Itayama
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.