Teams

Kruse

2026 KS 40 & Over Adult Indoor League · 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.88 / KANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-24vs Baalmann/BrownLost 03
L#1 DoublesDana Jolley / Nicole Meier vs Andrea Baalmann / DENISE OBR2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJoan Silovsky / Annie Wiggin vs Gaylene Alderson / Stacey Musser4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDanielle Kruse / Jodi Blair vs Michelle Breault / Lauren Brown2-6, 5-7
2026-05-24vs Baalmann/BrownLost 12
L#1 DoublesDana Jolley / Joan Silovsky vs Andrea Baalmann / Andrea Zynda1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNicole Meier / Danielle Kruse vs Stacey Musser / Kellie Atkinson6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJodi Blair / Annie Wiggin vs Michelle Breault / Lauren Brown1-6, 3-6
2026-05-17vs KS/Darrah-Geoffroy/40&Over3.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesDana Jolley / Liz Klausman vs Lindsey Wasinger / Katherine Kirk2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKareem Thomas / Joan Silovsky vs Barbara Nelson / Mary Jane Mullen6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesChristina Wiens / Annie Wiggin vs Julie Trout / Erica Ammar5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2026-05-17vs KS/Darrah-Geoffroy/40&Over3.0WLost 04
L#1 DoublesDana Jolley / Liz Klausman vs Lindsey Wasinger / Courtney Darrah5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesNicole Meier vs Katherine Kirk3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesJoan Silovsky / Annie Wiggin vs Mary Jane Mullen / Erica Ammar4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesChristina Wiens / Kareem Thomas vs Regine Feilmeier / Barbara Nelson4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-05-03vs Abbas/DuranLost 13
L#1 DoublesJoan Silovsky / Dana Jolley vs Paula Bette / Kathleen Bagwell6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesDanielle Kruse vs NOURA ABBAS1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesNicole Meier / Kareem Thomas vs Kym Ratcliffe / Jenny Cole6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJodi Blair / Annie Wiggin vs Erica Combs / DeAnn White2-6, 6-7
2026-05-03vs Abbas/DuranWon 21
L#1 DoublesNicole Meier / Danielle Kruse vs Paula Bette / Kym Ratcliffe6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJoan Silovsky / Dana Jolley vs DeAnn White / Kathleen Bagwell6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKareem Thomas / Annie Wiggin vs NOURA ABBAS / Erica Combs6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2026-04-12vs Thompson/RitchieWon 31
W#1 DoublesKareem Thomas / Dana Jolley vs Patricia Thompson / Katie Qu6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesDanielle Kruse vs Diana Tillison1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNicole Meier / Joan Silovsky vs Shelley Hunt / Matawee Paksin6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesChristina Wiens / Annie Wiggin vs Nallely Romo-Neuray / Bobbie Lee4-6, 2-6
2026-04-12vs Thompson/RitchieSplit 22
L#1 DoublesDana Jolley / Joan Silovsky vs Nallely Romo-Neuray / Bobbie Lee5-7, 1-6
W#1 SinglesChristina Wiens vs Kelly Wood6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesNicole Meier / Danielle Kruse vs Patricia Thompson / Shelley Hunt4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJodi Blair / Annie Wiggin vs Katie Qu / Dotsie Cuillo1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Kareem Thomas
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.85
Liz Klausman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Nicole Meier
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
2.80
Dana Jolley
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 3
2.67
Christina Wiens
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.66
Joan Silovsky
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
2.62
Danielle Kruse
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.45
Jodi Blair
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.29
Annie Wiggin
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jodi Blair + Kareem Thomas4159% games+13.0% vs expected
Danielle Kruse + Kareem Thomas2648% games+5.6% vs expected
Dana Jolley + Kareem Thomas4354% games−1.7% vs expected
Joan Silovsky + Dana Jolley1445% games−2.5% vs expected
Liz Klausman + Dana Jolley1445% games−9.7% vs expected
Danielle Kruse + Nicole Meier2347% gamesnot enough data
Dana Jolley + Nicole Meier044 matchesnot enough data
Jodi Blair + Nicole Meier314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kareem Thomas
43W–29L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.01
Liz Klausman
39W–46L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
2.85
Nicole Meier
32W–25L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
2.81
3
Dana Jolley
35W–43L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
2.80
3
Christina Wiens
23W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
12%88%1%
2.67
Joan Silovsky
9W–23L career · 8 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
2.66
3
Danielle Kruse
39W–50L career · 6 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
2.62
Jodi Blair
17W–34L career · 4 lines in 2026
63%37%<1%
2.45
2.5
Annie Wiggin
4W–12L career · type S · 8 lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.29

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.