Teams

Weeks 7.5 Combo 40s Mon AM

2023 Piedmont Combo 40 & Over · 7.5 40 & Over Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-10-09vs Warrick 7.5 Combo 40s Mon AMWon 10
W#1 DoublesKim Hunt / Toni Lewis vs Beverly Tuttle / Donna Warrick6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2023-10-02vs Jacobs 7.5 Combo 40s Mon AMLost 01
L#2 DoublesKim Hunt / Cindy Sumner vs Leigh Abraham / Andrea Sweat1-6, 4-6
2023-09-25vs Mays 7.5 Combo 40s Mon AMWon 10
W#2 DoublesKim Hunt / Cindy Sumner vs Linda Lowman / Mary Beth Hartman6-3, 6-1
2023-09-11Won 10
W#3 DoublesKim Hunt / Ashley Creviston vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-08-21vs Jacobs 7.5 Combo 40s Mon AMWon 10
W#3 DoublesCindy Sumner / Kim Hunt vs Leigh Abraham / Annetta Bartle6-2, 7-5
2023-08-14Won 10
W#3 DoublesKim Hunt / Ashley Creviston vs Victoria OWEN / Beth Griffin6-0, 6-1
2023-08-07vs Dean 7.5 Combo 40s Mon AMWon 10
W#3 DoublesKim Hunt / Stacey Dennehy vs Suzanne Perez / Karen Lubeck Smith6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 40 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Catherine Tanner
published 4
3.68
Felicia Price
published 4
3.61
Kim Hunt
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.47
Julie Spence
published
3.35
Gracie Womack
published 3.5
3.32
Martha Fogleman
published
3.30
Laura Vary
published
3.26
Cindy Sumner
published 3.5
3.23
Tracey Weeks
published
3.22
Stacey Dennehy
published
3.14
Teresa Tolin
published
3.11
Toni Lewis
published
3.10
Kelli Young
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Martha Fogleman + Toni Lewis2451% games+7.0% vs expected
Tracey Weeks + Kelli Young4256% games−5.1% vs expected
Julie Spence + Toni Lewis213 matchesnot enough data
Catherine Tanner + Toni Lewis123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Catherine Tanner
41W–39L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Felicia Price
7W–2L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.68
Kim Hunt
222W–161L career · 7 lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.61
Julie Spence
11W–14L career · no lines in 2023
59%41%<1%
3.47
3.5
Gracie Womack
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
3.35
Martha Fogleman
24W–18L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
Laura Vary
23W–23L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.30
3.5
Cindy Sumner
5W–19L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.26
Tracey Weeks
7W–3L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
Stacey Dennehy
8W–3L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.22
Teresa Tolin
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%<1%
3.14
Toni Lewis
12W–23L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.11
Kelli Young
6W–11L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.