Teams

Fuzz Realignment

Fall Adult 18 & Over Tri-Level · Men 4.5, 4.0, 3.5

8 players · average NTRP 3.75 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-10-05vs Not That TeamLost 03
L#1 DoublesRohan Gangaraju / Christopher Villarino vs Connor Sims / Andrew Gryce4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKesavan Srivilliputhur / Aniruddha Sen vs Brad Wisdom / Pushkar Chhajed0-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesWilliam Herridge / Max Rudolph vs Lawrence Embrey / Nicholas Tracz1-6, 0-6
2025-10-05vs Drop&LobLost 03
L#1 DoublesChristopher Villarino / Rohan Gangaraju vs Jimmy Daus / Kyle Ozaki4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKesavan Srivilliputhur / Aniruddha Sen vs Suhas Kumar / Brett Laine1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMax Rudolph / William Herridge vs Vishnu Chitneni / Srinivasa Sure2-6, 4-6
2025-10-04vs That TeamLost 03
L#1 DoublesRohan Gangaraju / Kesavan Srivilliputhur vs Evan Hays / Andrew Gryce4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAlan May / Rajesh Mantri vs Samanvoy Panati / Everett Meza3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesWilliam Herridge / Max Rudolph vs JP Jordan / Lawrence Embrey5-7, 4-6
2025-10-04vs Drop&LobLost 03
L#1 DoublesRohan Gangaraju / Kesavan Srivilliputhur vs Cody Everett / Kyle Ozaki2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAlan May / Aniruddha Sen vs Lang Hoang / Shahriyar Huq3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesWilliam Herridge / Rajesh Mantri vs Srinivasa Sure / Erik Tran1-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Kesavan Srivilliputhur
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Aniruddha Sen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.35
Rajesh Mantri
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.35
Alan May
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
William Herridge
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Christopher Villarino
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Max Rudolph
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Rohan Gangaraju
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Max Rudolph + William Herridge033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kesavan Srivilliputhur
2W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Aniruddha Sen
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rajesh Mantri
12W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%86%14%
3.35
3.5
Alan May
5W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.35
William Herridge
40W–41L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
Christopher Villarino
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Max Rudolph
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rohan Gangaraju
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.