Teams

5 RCC Koch 6.0 Mixed

2022 Richmond Mixed 40 & Over · Richmond Mixed 40 & Over 6.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-07-01vs 3 ACAC FunkLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmy Boschen / Adam Kemp vs Martinique Kandl / Craig Gittelman6-7, 2-6
2022-06-20vs 6 MTC CutlipLost 01
L#1 DoublesRon Armstrong / Amy Boschen vs Dan Weese / Noelle Crews2-6, 3-6
2022-06-06vs 2 Avalon Ghita 6.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesAdam Kemp / Amy Boschen vs Joseph Piwowarski / Cathy George6-2, 6-1
2022-05-20vs 3 ACAC FunkLost 01
L#1 DoublesJohn LaFratta / Amy Boschen vs Tim Kasten / Rebecca Cassilly6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2022-05-02vs 4 ACAC JohnstonLost 01
L#2 DoublesAmy Boschen / Ron Armstrong vs Dave Booth / Lisa Aaron6-4, 0-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 40 & Over 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Berkeley Darr
published 3.5
3.07
Zinie Sampson
published
2.87
Amy Boschen
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.86
Pam Koch
published
2.50
Beverly Davis
published 3
2.36
Catena Armstrong
published 2.5
John LaFratta
published
Patrick Riendeau
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Berkeley Darr
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.13
Zinie Sampson
15W–17L career · no lines in 2022
<1%29%71%
3.07
3
Amy Boschen
154W–164L career · 12 lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
2.87
Pam Koch
2W–7L career · no lines in 2022
86%14%<1%
2.86
3
Beverly Davis
4W–28L career · type A · no lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
2.50
2.5
Catena Armstrong
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
0%85%15%
2.36
John LaFratta
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Patrick Riendeau
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.