Teams

1-RGildehaus-YMCA

2022 Eno River Singles 55 & Over · Adult 55 & Over 3.5 Men Evening

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-31vs 3-TBuckley-CHTCWon 20
W#2 SinglesEd Holub vs Mark Higuchi6-1, 6-1
W#3 SinglesRod Boyle vs Timothy Buckley6-7, 3-3
2022-07-31vs 2-DStefan-HSLost 01
L#1 SinglesEd Holub vs Eric Lindblom3-6, 2-6
2022-07-19vs 2-DStefan-HSWon 20
W#1 SinglesDerek Saccoccio vs David Stefan5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 SinglesRod Boyle vs Craig Demarest6-3, 6-3
2022-07-12vs 3-TBuckley-CHTCLost 02
L#1 SinglesRod Boyle vs Wendell Gilland2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesStephen Rothchild vs Doug Kopec3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-07-01vs 3-TBuckley-CHTCSplit 11
L#1 SinglesStephen Rothchild vs Bob Stocking2-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesEd Holub vs Gary Glish4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2022-06-21vs 2-DStefan-HSSplit 11
L#1 SinglesStephen Rothchild vs Eric Lindblom6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesDerek Saccoccio vs Dave Thomas6-1, 6-1
2022-06-14vs 3-TBuckley-CHTCSplit 11
L#1 SinglesRod Boyle vs Doug Kopec4-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesStephen Rothchild vs Dan Tudor0-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 3.5 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Ed Holub
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.40
Derek Saccoccio
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.39
David Holub
published 3.5
3.37
Vincent Illiano
published
3.24
Stephen Rothchild
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Ralph Gildehaus
published
3.04
Rod Boyle
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3.5
Justin Bryant
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ed Holub + David Holub5166% games+11.5% vs expected
Derek Saccoccio + Ed Holub7163% gamesnot enough data
Vincent Illiano + Derek Saccoccio4159% gamesnot enough data
Rod Boyle + Stephen Rothchild2345% gamesnot enough data
Vincent Illiano + Ralph Gildehaus224 matchesnot enough data
Ed Holub + Stephen Rothchild314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ed Holub
78W–28L career · type A · 3 lines in 2022
<1%52%48%
3.49
3.5
Derek Saccoccio
132W–95L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%78%21%
3.40
3.5
David Holub
16W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.39
Vincent Illiano
19W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%15%
3.37
3.5
Stephen Rothchild
62W–60L career · 4 lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.24
Ralph Gildehaus
16W–18L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Rod Boyle
64W–75L career · 4 lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.04
Justin Bryant
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.