Teams

SGV Underdogs Aces-Bui-Diamond Bar HS/SU10

2025 Adult Division - 18 & Over San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Men 4.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.94 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
L#2 DoublesLam Bui / Ted Nuguid vs Rand Lee / Dastan Mazhetayev6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#1 DoublesLam Bui / Ted Nuguid vs Ashish Sandhu / Vansh Talwar6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAndrew Mesdjian / Ted Nuguid vs Rudy Tatang / Ted Shen4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Derek Fu
published 4
3.91
Manuel Almazan
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.89
Darren Wong
published 4
3.85
Andrew Mesdjian
published 4
3.81
Peter Cheng
published
3.79
Ted Nuguid
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Christopher Li
published 4
3.74
Feibi Liu
published 4
3.74
Travis Hatfield
published
3.73
CHIH HAO PAN
published 4
3.69
Lam Bui
published
3.43
James Phan
published 4
Chinna Ponnaganti
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Jordan Tatang
published
Vincent Pun
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lam Bui + Ted Nuguid044 matchesnot enough data
Peter Cheng + Lam Bui213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Derek Fu
12W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
4.06
Manuel Almazan
17W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Darren Wong
18W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.89
4
Andrew Mesdjian
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.85
Peter Cheng
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Ted Nuguid
50W–79L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.79
4
Christopher Li
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Feibi Liu
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%2%
3.74
Travis Hatfield
7W–10L career · no lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.74
4
CHIH HAO PAN
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
Lam Bui
12W–13L career · no lines in 2025
8%92%1%
3.69
4
James Phan
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
3.43
3.5
Chinna Ponnaganti
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jordan Tatang
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Vincent Pun
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.