Teams

RC RAVNAAS

2026 FW Adult 18 & Over League - Ladies · Friday Ladies 3.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.38 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-17vs STC ZVONECEKWon 32
L#1 DoublesAlly Ravnaas / Keelie Montague vs Anna Clark / Lacy Frenzel1-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesSadie Upham vs Kavita Brignac4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLindsey Baird / Elizabeth Deegan vs Dawn Vandeberg / Stephanie Ertz6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMadi Boenker vs Jeanette Hough7-5, 7-5
L#3 DoublesKatie Howard / Michelle Kyle vs Shannon Small / Anne Zvonecek3-6, 5-7
2026-04-10vs ATC GREENSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMacOn McColm / Madi Boenker vs Margaret Collier / Hella Schafner3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesAllison Nixon / Melissa Wallace vs Cass Weyandt / Kim Bell6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 SinglesMichelle Kyle vs Kami Wallace1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMallory Lummis / Lindsey Baird vs Lally Kelly / G LaRae DeGroot6-1, 6-0
2026-04-07vs BIR BARTLETTLost 23
L#1 DoublesCasey Lebus / Mallory Lummis vs Melanie Bartlett / Tiffany Rogers5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Deegan vs Chandra Holt3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAlly Ravnaas / Margo Bush vs Kimberly Knox / Susan Covington5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKatie Howard vs Lina Duraini3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesSadie Upham / Ashley Watson vs Beau Bone / Gina Godsey3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-03-31vs LTF TARKINGTONLost 12
L#1 DoublesAllison Nixon / Ashley Watson vs Carol Reinhart / Lori Ringo2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMadi Boenker / MacOn McColm vs Denise Gehler / Sue Stuecheli7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMichelle Kyle / Sadie Upham vs Felicia Head / Michelle Hyland5-7, 2-6
2026-03-13vs STC LOUKS/KISTLost 05
L#1 DoublesAlly Ravnaas / Casey Lebus vs Courtney Louks / Vandai Le2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesSadie Upham vs Rachel Raley6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMolly van Amburgh / Madi Boenker vs Lindsey Castner / Chelsea Cox1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesElizabeth Deegan vs Abby Hyman3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKatie Howard / MacOn McColm vs Lauren Biery / Leigh Ann Downing0-6, 1-6
2026-03-06vs STC ZAVASKYWon 32
W#1 DoublesCasey Lebus / Keelie Montague vs Debbie Greenwood / Peggy Booth6-1, 7-6
L#1 SinglesSadie Upham vs Chelsea Klinke2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAshley Watson / Lindsey Baird vs Judy Zavasky / Alison Morris6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesElizabeth Deegan vs Erin Myers6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAlly Ravnaas / Madi Boenker vs Vanessa Ramos / Tiffany Larza1-6, 1-6
2026-02-27vs OAK RANDOLLWon 32
W#1 DoublesMallory Lummis / Casey Lebus vs Laura Randoll / Katherine Wayles2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesSadie Upham vs Leah Truitt4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMelissa Wallace / Allison Nixon vs Leslie Maddie / Erika Steinman6-4, 6-2
L#2 SinglesMadi Boenker vs Nancy Horan1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKeelie Montague / Ashley Watson vs Jodi Crawford / Lisa Polly4-6, 6-7
2026-02-20vs RID EVANSLost 14
L#1 DoublesMargo Bush / Madi Boenker vs April Nieves / Molly Davidson4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesSadie Upham vs Sara Slesinger6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAlly Ravnaas / Keelie Montague vs Sophie Kriss / Ashley Peeders4-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesAllison Nixon vs Lani Payne Sandu1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMacOn McColm / Michelle Kyle vs Sydney Munson / Amanda Tonroy0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Friday Ladies 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Mallory Lummis
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.31
Lindsey Baird
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.29
Sadie Upham
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.23
Casey Lebus
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Allison Nixon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.20
Keelie Montague
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.19
Margo Bush
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.18
Ally Ravnaas
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.13
Susanna Gorski Bartolomei
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.05
MacOn McColm
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.04
Madi Boenker
usually #2 Doubles 29%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.04
Michelle Kyle
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.89
Elizabeth Deegan
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 3
2.81
Meagan Nayfa
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.66
Katie Howard
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
Molly van Amburgh
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Keelie Montague + Ally Ravnaas224 matchesnot enough data
Mallory Lummis + Casey Lebus224 matchesnot enough data
Katie Howard + Elizabeth Deegan033 matchesnot enough data
Allison Nixon + Elizabeth Deegan213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mallory Lummis
4W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
3.35
Lindsey Baird
4W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31
Sadie Upham
8W–6L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Casey Lebus
5W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Allison Nixon
10W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.21
Keelie Montague
4W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
Margo Bush
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Ally Ravnaas
5W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.18
Susanna Gorski Bartolomei
11W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.13
MacOn McColm
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.05
Madi Boenker
8W–6L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.04
Michelle Kyle
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
3.04
3
Elizabeth Deegan
12W–9L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.89
Meagan Nayfa
5W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
2.81
Katie Howard
0W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
2.66
Molly van Amburgh
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.