Teams

CTL55/Echols

Combo 55 & Over · 55 & Over Combo Women - 8.5 LLAS

11 players · average NTRP / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Flight standings1 teams · 55 & Over Combo Women - 8.5 LLAS
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CTL55/Echols000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Rolfe Olsen
published
4.10
Julian Horst
published
4.10
Suzanne Gray
published
3.90
Kathi Lacy
published
3.79
Toni Odom
published
3.73
Nancy Butts Foy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.65
Mary Garvin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Lisa Echols
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Kathy Foster
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Kay Wescott
published
3.29
Karen Thompson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathy Foster + Karen Thompson4357% games+4.9% vs expected
Lisa Echols + Kathy Foster8554% games−0.8% vs expected
Lisa Echols + Kathi Lacy4153% games−2.1% vs expected
Nancy Butts Foy + Kay Wescott5249% games−7.5% vs expected
Rolfe Olsen + Julian Horst4256% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Butts Foy + Karen Thompson224 matchesnot enough data
Kathi Lacy + Kathy Foster314 matchesnot enough data
Kay Wescott + Lisa Echols213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rolfe Olsen
20W–11L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%3%
4.24
Julian Horst
19W–13L career · no lines in 2026
23%76%<1%
4.10
Suzanne Gray
6W–27L career · no lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
4.10
Kathi Lacy
46W–31L career · no lines in 2026
<1%75%24%
3.90
Toni Odom
13W–20L career · no lines in 2026
93%7%<1%
3.79
Nancy Butts Foy
76W–104L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
Mary Garvin
32W–34L career · 2 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.65
Lisa Echols
61W–40L career · 1 line in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.62
Kathy Foster
68W–50L career · 1 line in 2026
27%72%<1%
3.58
Kay Wescott
66W–38L career · no lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
3.47
Karen Thompson
78W–63L career · no lines in 2026
93%7%<1%
3.29

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.