Teams

NITA E 40W18a Score (Knutte)

2024 NITA1 ESL Adult 18 & Over · NITA ESL 18 & Over 4.0 Women

20 players · average NTRP 4.04 / NORTHERN ILLINOIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-11-11vs NITA E 40W18h Oak Lawn (Gaynor)Won 40
W#1 DoublesMeghan Jones / Kelly Good vs Jennifer McClelland / Catherine Wasylenko6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJill Tweedie vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJill Odenbeck / Alicja Kujalowicz vs Mary Richardson-Webb / Lisa Franco6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMargaret Weiss / Marion Zerfoss vs Angela Ratkovich / Lynn Zolfo6-2, 6-1
2023-11-05vs NITA E 40W18b Norris (Buxton)Won 30
W#1 DoublesJill Tweedie / Ann Potter vs Cindy Sullivan / Marilyn Tansey6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHalle McCormick / Jill Odenbeck vs MEREDITH BETTCHER / Cheri Medus6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLaurie Knutte / Lisa Rowen vs Renee Buxton / Susie Wendel6-3, 6-3
W#1 DoublesRebecca Bosack / Kristine Lonsway vs Erica Eisner / Soraya McTeague6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesMargaret Weiss vs Ginger Riessen2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAndrea Galligan Kuc / Alicja Kujalowicz vs Dawn Baumann / Lynette Trost - *3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesHalle McCormick / Julie Boruff vs Debbie Schaefer / Leah Starkman6-2, 6-3
2023-10-28vs NITA E 40W18c Naperville (Madura)Split 22
W#1 DoublesLaurie Knutte / Marinne Leonard vs Gretchen Langer / Noelle Tepas6-0, 6-2
L#1 SinglesMargaret Weiss vs Allison Genovese3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJulie Boruff / Jill Odenbeck vs Todra Oken / Martha Skryd5-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesKerri Sedlacek / Marion Zerfoss vs Lindsay Freeman / Helen Yang6-3, 7-6
2023-10-21vs NITA E 40W18f Rush Copley (Stine)Won 30
W#1 DoublesHalle McCormick / Andrea Galligan Kuc vs Michele Kleeman / Dorothy OMalley4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnn Potter / Alicja Kujalowicz vs Rebecca Stine / Betsy Utterback6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCindy Bielik / Lisa Rowen vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-10-15vs NITA E 40W18e Oak Brook (Lukas)Lost 13
L#1 DoublesMarinne Leonard / Lisa Rowen - * vs Maureen Porter / Tracy Richards2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesMargaret Weiss vs Louise Burnison2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSuzi Winters / Rebecca Bosack vs Colleen Stover / Tracie Wilcox6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKristine Lonsway / Laurie Knutte vs Karen Materick / Molly McGinnis3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-09-23vs NITA E 40W18d Tam (Wright)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesCindy Bielik / Alicja Kujalowicz vs Martha Davis / Courtney Tornow2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLaurie Knutte / Rebecca Bosack vs Shannon Pirron / Huan Chang6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMarinne Leonard / Suzi Winters vs Laura Purcell / Danielle Balzano6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · NITA ESL 18 & Over 4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NITA E 40W18e Oak Brook (Lukas)7023515145
2NITA E 40W18a Score (Knutte)6120820171
3NITA E 40W18b Norris (Buxton)52171126201
4NITA E 40W18g Heritage (Jurczyk/Campanelli)3315919157
5NITA E 40W18c Naperville (Madura)34141430227
6NITA E 40W18d Tam (Wright)24121226183
7NITA E 40W18f Rush Copley (Stine)1652347283
8NITA E 40W18h Oak Lawn (Gaynor)0722652329

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Cindy Bielik
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
4.02
Jill Tweedie
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
4.01
Rebecca Bosack
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.94
Jill Odenbeck
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.91
Laurie Knutte
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.78
Lisa Rowen
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.76
Marinne Leonard
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.75
Andrea Galligan Kuc
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Ann Potter
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.74
Alicja Kujalowicz
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.72
Julie Boruff
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.63
Mary Sullivan
published 4
3.58
Margaret Weiss
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.57
Kerri Sedlacek
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.53
Julie Sujack
published 4
3.44
Kelly Good
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Halle McCormick
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Kristine Lonsway
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Marion Zerfoss
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Suzi Winters
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marinne Leonard + Rebecca Bosack4167% games+14.6% vs expected
Lisa Rowen + Cindy Bielik10461% games+10.1% vs expected
Cindy Bielik + Jill Odenbeck3457% games+7.5% vs expected
Kerri Sedlacek + Mary Sullivan21044% games+6.1% vs expected
Laurie Knutte + Rebecca Bosack12460% games+5.7% vs expected
Marinne Leonard + Cindy Bielik11558% games+4.7% vs expected
Kristine Lonsway + Laurie Knutte241355% games+4.4% vs expected
Kerri Sedlacek + Cindy Bielik9358% games+3.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cindy Bielik
202W–83L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%33%67%
4.06
4
Jill Tweedie
40W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%45%55%
4.02
4.5
Rebecca Bosack
118W–46L career · 3 lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
4.01
4
Jill Odenbeck
193W–62L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.94
4
Laurie Knutte
255W–121L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.91
4
Lisa Rowen
152W–57L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Marinne Leonard
154W–82L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.76
4
Andrea Galligan Kuc
102W–112L career · 2 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Ann Potter
22W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Alicja Kujalowicz
33W–19L career · 4 lines in 2024
4%92%3%
3.74
Julie Boruff
117W–78L career · 2 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Mary Sullivan
47W–59L career · no lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
3.63
Margaret Weiss
83W–41L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%29%71%
3.58
4
Kerri Sedlacek
99W–73L career · 1 line in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.57
4
Julie Sujack
81W–103L career · no lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
3.53
Kelly Good
105W–84L career · 1 line in 2024
66%34%<1%
3.44
Halle McCormick
20W–8L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kristine Lonsway
93W–74L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Marion Zerfoss
5W–3L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Suzi Winters
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.