Teams

Esposito - The Slice Girls

2025 Montgomery Tri-Level Fall · Montgomery Tri-Level Fall 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-11-03vs Cornelius - Triple ThreatLost 02
L#1 DoublesStephania Donoho / Giulia Jaeger vs Jane Davenport / Gail Kelleher0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesNancy Lao / Yolanda Chan vs Margueritte Harlow / Brice Rhee1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Tri-Level Fall 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Lynne Lightfoote
published
2.86
Rubana Kalyani
published
2.82
Ingrid Martin
published
Barbara Braffett
published 3
2.72
Helen Chao
published
2.72
Tonya Esposito
published
2.72
Missy Edwards
published
2.65
Nicole Islinger
published
2.63
Nancy Lao
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
Yolanda Chan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Giulia Jaeger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jeanne Cordisco
published
Jenny Kehoe
published
Niki Hamilton
published
Stephania Donoho
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Lao + Yolanda Chan134 matchesnot enough data
Rubana Kalyani + Tonya Esposito224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lynne Lightfoote
7W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89
Rubana Kalyani
6W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.86
Ingrid Martin
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Barbara Braffett
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Helen Chao
10W–14L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%2%
2.72
Tonya Esposito
12W–14L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Missy Edwards
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Nicole Islinger
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
2.65
Nancy Lao
5W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
17%82%<1%
2.63
Yolanda Chan
5W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
28%72%<1%
2.58
Giulia Jaeger
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jeanne Cordisco
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jenny Kehoe
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Niki Hamilton
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Stephania Donoho
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.